Verify any claim · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
Science“Diamonds are among the rarest gemstones on Earth.”
The conclusion
Diamonds are not among the rarest gemstones on Earth. While diamond formation requires specific geological conditions, diamonds are actually among the most common gemstones by volume — the International Gem Society calls them "likely the most common gem in nature." Numerous gemstones, including Red Beryl (1,000+ times rarer), Painite, Tanzanite, and Alexandrite, dramatically exceed diamonds in scarcity. The perception of diamond rarity was largely shaped by marketing, not geological reality.
Caveats
- The claim conflates absolute geological rarity (diamonds form under extreme conditions) with comparative rarity within the gemstone class — where diamonds actually rank among the most common, not the rarest.
- The 'diamond rarity' narrative was significantly shaped by De Beers marketing campaigns rather than reflecting actual gemstone scarcity rankings.
- Even GIA, a leading gemological authority, concedes that 'many diamonds are both widely available and very affordable,' undermining the rarity framing.
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
The terms "gem" and "gemstone" mean any mineral or organic material (e.g., pearl and petrified wood) used for personal adornment, display, or object of art because it possesses beauty, rarity, and durability. Of the 2,700 mineral species, only about 100 possess all these attributes.
A precious gemstone has beauty, durability, and rarity, whereas a semiprecious gemstone has only one or two of these qualities. A gem is a gemstone that has been cut and polished. Diamond, corundum (ruby and sapphire), beryl (emerald and aquamarine), topaz, and opal are generally classed as precious stones.
Yet diamonds are very rare because the mantle has a relatively low abundance of carbon. Furthermore, diamonds are far from evenly distributed throughout the earth—they are found in mineable quantities only in very unique geologic settings.
Diamonds may not be as rare as once believed, but this finding in a new Johns Hopkins University research report won't mean deep discounts at local jewelry stores. "Diamond formation in the deep Earth, the very deep Earth, may be a more common process than we thought," said Johns Hopkins geochemist Dimitri A. Sverjensky.
In terms of its natural abundance on earth, diamond is a relatively rare mineral. Prospectors and geologists who make a career searching for diamond deposits tend to come up dry. Furthermore, only about one-third of the 110–130 million carats of diamond mined each year is actually of gem quality, with larger and higher-clarity diamonds being the scarcest.
Today, many diamonds are both widely available and very affordable. Yet large, fine-quality diamonds with high clarity and good color are still quite rare. Red diamonds, green diamonds and blue diamonds with medium to dark tones and moderate saturation are extremely rare.
Hidden deep in Myanmar's metamorphic rocks lies Painite — a gemstone so rare, only a few hundred exist on Earth. Red Beryl, found almost exclusively in the Wah Wah Mountains of Utah, is over 1,000 times rarer than diamond, with an estimated one gem-quality crystal for every 150,000 diamonds mined.
All gem-quality materials are rare. They compose just a tiny fraction of the Earth. However, diamonds actually number among the most common gems. Our current knowledge of gem formation indicates that diamonds are likely the most common gem in nature.
In this comprehensive guide, you'll discover ten gemstones that are actually rarer than diamonds, each with its own fascinating characteristics and history. Benitoite exceeds diamond's rarity as well as its "fire" or dispersion, combined with its often sapphire-blue color.
The country that produces the most diamonds is Russia, with 113,600 thousand carats produced between 2016 and 2020. This large amount translates to 22,720 kilograms worth of diamonds, for a more direct comparison to the other many other gemstones on the list.
Diamonds only form under very specific conditions, which are extreme heat and pressure 90–150 miles beneath Earth's surface. For them to reach the surface, rare kimberlite and lamproite volcanic eruptions must occur, geological events that are extremely uncommon in Earth's history. This scarcity ensures that natural diamonds remain among the most precious gemstones in existence.
Compared to other precious gemstones like emerald, sapphires and rubies, diamonds are actually quite plentiful. Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) released a study stating that an estimated quadrillion tons of rough diamonds lie deep below the Earth's surface.
While diamonds are often considered the standard of precious stones, there are others that are far rarer. Red Beryl, another rare beauty, is estimated to be 1,000 times rarer than diamonds, with most specimens coming from a single location in Utah.
Diamonds are not the rarest or most valuable gems. Most diamonds produced are not jewelry-grade diamonds. While high-quality, jewelry-grade diamonds are certainly valuable, there are many other gemstones like red beryl and tanzanite that are more valuable than diamonds.
While a 5 carat diamond ring or flawless engagement ring can fetch a fortune, some gemstones outprice even the priciest GIA certified stones. Alexandrite, for example, with its limited deposits, is rarer than lab grown diamonds.
Red Beryl: This is one of the rarest gemstones on Earth. It is found in only a few locations in Utah and New Mexico. It requires a specific volcanic environment called a rhyolite flow.
The truth is, diamonds are not rare in the sense that De Beers — the creator of the campaign — made them out to be so many years ago. In fact, diamonds aren't even the rarest of the gemstones. Gemstones that are rarer than diamonds include rubies, emeralds, and sapphires because they are harder to find.
Diamonds are valued and prized for their rarity, but they aren't the rarest gemstones in the world. There are several gemstones that are even rarer. Only one crystal of red beryl exists for every 150,000 diamonds.
The funny thing is that Diamonds aren't actually that rare as a gem material (there are rare Diamonds though!) and there are many other gemstones that are a lot rarer, so let's take a look at what these rare gems are… Blue Sapphire, Ruby, Emerald, Spinel, Black Opal, Paraiba Tourmaline, Tsavorite Garnet, Alexandrite, Tanzanite, Jadeite, Padparadscha Sapphire, Demantoid Garnet are all rarer.
Red Beryl (Bixbite) – Rarer than Diamonds. This gemstone stands immensely rare because it exists 8,000 times more scarce than diamonds. Scientists regard Painite as the most scarce mineral ever found on our planet.
There are only four gemstones considered to be truly precious: diamonds, rubies, sapphires, and emeralds. When these stones were first categorized, it was mainly due to the rarity and the value of the 4 precious stones versus the rest.
Although the popularity of the diamond is well known, a vast array of other gems are much more rare and pricier per carat. Tanzanite... is one thousand times rarer than a diamond.
Red beryl, sometimes called bixbite, is far rarer than diamonds. Its deep red hue and limited supply make it one of the world's priciest gemstones per carat.
Expert review
How each expert evaluated the evidence and arguments
The claim asserts diamonds are "among the rarest gemstones on Earth," which logically requires that diamonds rank near the top of the rarity spectrum within the gemstone class — not merely that they are rare in an absolute sense. The evidence pool creates a clear logical distinction: Sources 3 and 5 (GIA) establish that diamonds are geologically rare in formation and mineable quantities, but Sources 7, 8, 9, 13, 18, 19, 20, 22 collectively and directly demonstrate that numerous gemstones (Red Beryl, Painite, Tanzanite, Benitoite, Alexandrite, and others) are orders of magnitude rarer than diamonds, with Source 8 (IGS) going so far as to call diamonds "likely the most common gem in nature." The proponent commits a scope fallacy: evidence that diamonds are "rare" (true in an absolute geological sense) does not logically support the claim that they are "among the rarest gemstones" — a comparative, superlative-class claim that requires ranking near the top within the ~100-gemstone peer group. The opponent's rebuttal correctly identifies this category error and marshals direct comparative evidence showing diamonds rank poorly on rarity within the gemstone class itself. Source 6 (GIA) further concedes wide availability and affordability for most diamonds, and Source 4 (Johns Hopkins/ScienceDaily) undermines the scarcity narrative at the formation level. The claim is therefore false as a comparative superlative: diamonds are not "among the rarest" gemstones — they are, by multiple credible accounts, among the more common ones within the gemstone class.
The claim that diamonds are "among the rarest gemstones on Earth" critically omits the well-documented fact that, within the gemstone class itself, diamonds are actually considered among the most common gems — Source 8 (IGS) explicitly states diamonds "number among the most common gems" and are "likely the most common gem in nature," while Sources 7, 9, 13, 18, 19, 20, 22, and 23 collectively identify numerous gemstones (Red Beryl, Painite, Tanzanite, Benitoite, Alexandrite, and many others) that are orders of magnitude rarer than diamonds, with Red Beryl alone being 1,000–8,000 times rarer. The claim cherry-picks the geological difficulty of diamond formation (Sources 3, 5, 11) to imply extreme rarity, while omitting that: (1) diamonds are the most widely mined gemstone by volume (Source 10 — Russia alone produced 113,600 thousand carats in just four years); (2) GIA itself concedes "many diamonds are both widely available and very affordable" (Source 6); (3) deep-Earth diamond abundance is estimated at a quadrillion tons (Source 12); and (4) the "rarity" framing was historically manufactured by De Beers marketing (Source 17). Once the full picture is considered — that diamonds are geologically constrained but are nonetheless the most commonly mined and available gem, with dozens of gemstones far exceeding their scarcity — the claim creates a fundamentally false impression and cannot be sustained.
The highest-authority sources in this pool are USGS (Source 1, high-authority government) and GIA's Gems & Gemology (Source 3, high-authority peer-reviewed gemological journal) and GIA's historical overview (Source 5). While Sources 3 and 5 do call diamonds "very rare" and a "relatively rare mineral," this characterization is about diamonds' absolute geological scarcity — not their rarity relative to other gemstones. The claim specifically asserts diamonds are "among the rarest gemstones," which requires a comparative ranking within the gemstone class. The IGS (Source 8, moderate-authority professional gemological society) directly states diamonds "number among the most common gems" and are "likely the most common gem in nature." Multiple independent sources across varying authority levels — Sources 7, 9, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22 — consistently identify numerous gemstones (Red Beryl, Painite, Tanzanite, Benitoite, Alexandrite, etc.) that are orders of magnitude rarer than diamonds, with Red Beryl cited as 1,000× rarer. Even GIA itself (Source 6, high-authority) concedes "many diamonds are both widely available and very affordable," and Source 4 (ScienceDaily citing Johns Hopkins peer-reviewed research) reports diamond formation is more common than previously thought. The proponent's rebuttal correctly notes that some supporting sources discuss market availability rather than geological rarity, but the comparative rarity evidence from IGS and multiple gemological sources is robust and consistent. The claim that diamonds are "among the rarest" gemstones is not supported by the most reliable sources when evaluated comparatively within the gemstone class — in fact, the preponderance of credible evidence refutes it.
Expert summary
What do you think of the claim?
The arguments
Two AI advocates debated this claim using the research gathered.
Authoritative gemological and geological sources explicitly characterize diamond as naturally rare: the GIA's Gems & Gemology notes diamonds are “very rare” due to low mantle carbon and their occurrence in mineable quantities only in unique geologic settings (Source 3, GIA), and GIA's historical overview likewise calls diamond a “relatively rare mineral” with only a minority of mined output being gem-quality (Source 5). Since USGS defines gemstones as materials valued for “rarity” and indicates only ~100 of ~2,700 mineral species qualify as gemstones at all (Source 1, USGS), diamonds' documented geologic scarcity places them squarely among the rare gemstone class even if some niche minerals may be rarer.
Your argument commits a classic category error: you conflate "rare as a mineral species" with "among the rarest gemstones," but Source 8 (IGS) explicitly states diamonds "number among the most common gems" and are "likely the most common gem in nature" — directly dismantling your use of Source 3 and Source 5, which only establish that diamonds have geological formation constraints, not that they are among the rarest within the gemstone class itself. Furthermore, your appeal to Source 1's USGS definition actually backfires: if only ~100 of 2,700 minerals qualify as gemstones, then the claim must be evaluated against those ~100 peers, and Sources 7, 9, 13, and 22 collectively show that at least ten or more gemstones — including Red Beryl (1,000 times rarer), Painite, Tanzanite, and Benitoite — dramatically exceed diamonds in scarcity, proving diamonds do not belong "among the rarest" even within that exclusive gemstone class.
The claim that diamonds are "among the rarest gemstones on Earth" is directly contradicted by multiple credible sources: Source 8 (IGS) explicitly states that "diamonds actually number among the most common gems" and are "likely the most common gem in nature," while Source 7 notes that Red Beryl alone is over 1,000 times rarer than diamond — a figure echoed by Sources 13, 18, and 20, which collectively identify numerous gemstones (Painite, Tanzanite, Benitoite, Alexandrite, and others) that vastly exceed diamonds in scarcity. Furthermore, Source 4 (ScienceDaily, citing Johns Hopkins research) and Source 12 report that diamond formation in the deep Earth is far more common than previously believed — with an estimated quadrillion tons lying beneath the surface — and Source 6 (GIA itself) concedes that "many diamonds are both widely available and very affordable," fatally undermining any claim that diamonds belong among Earth's rarest gemstones.
You're conflating “not the single rarest” with “not among the rarest,” but pointing to a handful of extreme outliers like painite or red beryl (Sources 7, 13, 18, 20) doesn't negate that GIA's technical geology literature still characterizes diamonds as “very rare” in mineable quantities due to unique geologic settings (Source 3, GIA) and as a “relatively rare mineral” with only a minority being gem-quality (Source 5). And your “widely available/affordable” and “more common formation” points are a category error: Source 6 (GIA) is about market availability and explicitly says fine diamonds are still rare, while Source 4 (ScienceDaily) discusses deep-Earth formation processes rather than the USGS/GIA-relevant question of recoverable gemstone rarity (Source 1, USGS; Source 3, GIA).