Audit-grade fact-checking for AI products that can't afford to hallucinate.
Multi-stage, multi-model adversarial verification grounded in real-sources. Opposing-side debate, independent multi-axis audit, full citation trail.
Just want to check one claim?
Verify a single claim instead →
Independent multi-vendor LLM pipeline·OpenAPI 3.1·Cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini
For AI product teams
Four API primitives form a depth ladder:
-
/extract
Pull verifiable claims out of any text
-
/assess
Fast multi-model verdict for sync UX
-
/verify
Full adversarial pipeline with citations
-
/ask
Follow-up Q&A grounded on a verification
Used for
incident triage · async runtime verification · pre-release CI
For anyone with a claim
Paste a statement, link, or question. Get a sourced verdict with the reasoning shown — not just an answer.
Example
“Failure by police to read Miranda rights does not invalidate an arrest.”
{ if(a&&!a.target){ if(a.pathname===location.pathname){$event.preventDefault();overlay=null;if(history.state&&history.state._overlay)history.replaceState({},'',location.href)}else{$event.preventDefault();location.href=a.href} }})($event.target.closest('a[href]'))">
{ if(a&&!a.target){ if(a.pathname===location.pathname){$event.preventDefault();overlay=null;if(history.state&&history.state._overlay)history.replaceState({},'',location.href)}else{$event.preventDefault();location.href=a.href} }})($event.target.closest('a[href]'))">