Fact-Check Any Claim. Instantly.

Real sources. Independent analysis. Human review.

Claim analyzed

“The human stomach can dissolve razor blades.”

The Conclusion

The claim is
Misleading
6/10

Executive Summary

The claim is misleading. While controlled lab studies show stomach acid can corrode razor blade material over 24 hours, most of the blade remains intact (63% mass). Real stomachs don't retain objects long enough for significant dissolution.

Warnings

  • The strongest evidence comes from lab simulations, not actual human stomachs - real gastric residence times are typically much shorter than the 24-hour exposure used in studies
  • The claim conflates chemical capability with practical reality - while stomach acid can corrode razor blade material, most of the blade mass remains intact even after prolonged exposure
  • Some sources incorrectly conflate 'melting' with 'dissolving' - these are different processes, and the relevant question is corrosion rate under normal physiological conditions
Full Analysis

The Claim

How we interpreted the user input

Intent

Verify whether human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve metal razor blades

Testable Claim

The user's input, neutralized and hardened into a testable hypothesis

“The human stomach can dissolve razor blades.”

The Research

What we found online

Summary of Findings

9 sources used 4 supporting 2 refuting 3 neutral

All sources are listed in the Sources section at the end of this report.

The Debate

The for and against arguments

P
Proponent Argues TRUE

The claim is true because controlled experimental evidence shows razor blades undergo substantial acid-driven dissolution in gastric conditions: Source 1 (PubMed, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997) reports razor blades incubated in simulated gastric juice at 37°C lost mass progressively (down to 63% of original weight at 24 hours) and even the thickened back of a single-edged blade “totally dissolved” within 2 hours. This is consistent with the well-established extreme acidity of human gastric acid (pH ~1.5–3.5) documented in Source 4 (Fysiobasen) and reiterated in Source 5 (Science Info), which explicitly summarizes the same study's finding that razor-blade components can disintegrate under stomach-acid exposure—demonstrating the stomach can dissolve razor blades (at least partially, and sometimes completely for parts) given sufficient immersion time.

O
Opponent Rebuttal

You cherry-picked the 2-hour dissolution of only "the thickened back of a single-edged blade" from Source 1 (PubMed) while ignoring that the main blade body retained 63% of its weight after 24 hours, and you completely disregard Source 8 (LLM Background Knowledge) which explains that typical 1-2 hour stomach residence time prevents the extended exposure your laboratory study required. Your argument commits the fallacy of hasty generalization by extrapolating from artificial 24-hour laboratory conditions to real physiological scenarios where objects don't remain in the stomach long enough for significant dissolution to occur.

O
Opponent Argues FALSE

Source 6 (indianexpress.com) directly contradicts the claim, with Dr. Reddy stating that "HCL in the stomach cannot melt metals but can cause rusting," and Source 8 (LLM Background Knowledge) confirms that typical stomach residence time of 1-2 hours severely limits significant dissolution of stainless steel razor blades in vivo, despite what laboratory studies with extended 24-hour exposure might suggest. The critical distinction between controlled laboratory conditions using simulated gastric juice for extended periods versus real-world physiological conditions renders the claim fundamentally misleading about what actually occurs in the human stomach.

P
Proponent Rebuttal

You're leaning on Source 6 (indianexpress.com) and Source 8 (LLM Background Knowledge) to redefine the claim into “melting metals quickly in vivo,” but the motion says “dissolve,” and Source 1 (PubMed, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) directly demonstrates acid-driven dissolution under gastric conditions—razor blades losing 37% mass in 24 hours and even a single-edged blade's thickened back “totally dissolved” in 2 hours. Your “real-world residence time” objection is a red herring because it argues about typicality and speed rather than capability: Source 1 (PubMed, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) establishes the stomach's chemistry can dissolve razor-blade material given sufficient immersion, which is exactly what the claim asserts.

You'll need an account first

Create a free account to get exclusive early access and be the first to chat live with the Proponent and Opponent.

Live Chat is in closed beta

We're rolling this out to a small group first. Join the waitlist and we'll let you know as soon as your access is ready.

The Adjudication

How each panelist evaluated the evidence and arguments

Panelist 1 — The Source Auditor
Focus: Source Reliability & Independence
Mostly True
7/10

Source 1 (PubMed/Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) is the most reliable evidence with authority score 0.95, published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, demonstrating controlled experimental proof that razor blades dissolve in simulated gastric juice (37% mass loss in 24 hours, complete dissolution of single-edge blade backs in 2 hours). While Source 6 (indianexpress.com) and Source 8 (LLM Background Knowledge) raise valid points about real-world residence time limitations, the high-authority experimental evidence confirms the stomach's chemical capability to dissolve razor blade material, making the claim mostly true despite practical limitations.

Weakest Sources

Source 7 (Grunge) is unreliable because it's a pop culture website with unknown publication date and low authority score 0.55Source 9 (Industry Tap) is unreliable because it's a general interest blog with low authority score 0.5 making broad claims without citing specific studies
Confidence: 8/10
Panelist 2 — The Logic Examiner
Focus: Inferential Soundness & Fallacies
Mostly True
7/10

Source 1 (PubMed, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) provides direct experimental evidence that simulated gastric juice dissolves razor blades (63% remaining at 24h, complete dissolution of single-edge blade back in 2h), establishing that the stomach's chemical environment possesses the capability to dissolve razor-blade material—the opponent's rebuttal correctly notes residence-time limitations but conflates "can dissolve" (capability) with "typically dissolves completely in vivo" (practical outcome), while the proponent's logic holds because the claim asserts capability rather than routine occurrence. The claim is mostly true: the evidence logically supports that human stomach acid can dissolve razor blades given sufficient exposure time, though the opponent raises a valid scope concern about in vitro versus in vivo conditions that prevents a perfect score.

Logical Fallacies

Opponent's hasty generalization accusation is itself misapplied: the proponent argues capability (supported by Source 1's controlled experiment), while the opponent shifts the goalposts by requiring typical in vivo outcomes rather than chemical capabilityOpponent's appeal to authority (Source 6, Dr. Reddy) uses 'cannot melt metals' to refute 'can dissolve'—a subtle equivocation between melting (phase change) and dissolution (chemical corrosion), which are distinct processesProponent's 'red herring' accusation is partially valid: the opponent does shift focus from capability to practical likelihood, though residence time is relevant context rather than pure distraction
Confidence: 8/10
Panelist 3 — The Context Analyst
Focus: Completeness & Framing
Misleading
5/10

The claim omits key context that the best supporting evidence is an in‑vitro study using simulated gastric juice with long immersion times (up to 24 hours) where most of a razor blade still remained (63% mass at 24h) and only a specific component fully dissolved quickly, which can mislead readers into thinking whole blades routinely dissolve in real stomachs (Source 1, PubMed—Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; echoed by Source 5, Science Info). With full context, it's more accurate to say stomach acid can corrode/partially dissolve razor-blade material under prolonged exposure, but the unqualified statement “can dissolve razor blades” is misleading as a general impression about in‑vivo reality (Source 6, Indian Express; Source 8, background).

Missing Context

The strongest evidence is in vitro (simulated gastric juice at 37°C), not direct observation of whole razor blades dissolving inside human stomachs (Source 1, PubMed—Gastrointestinal Endoscopy).Extent and timeframe matter: after 24 hours the blade still retained ~63% of its mass; “total dissolution” in 2 hours applied to the thickened back of a single-edged blade, not the entire blade (Source 1).Real-world physiology differs: many ingested objects do not remain in the stomach for 24 hours, and typical gastric residence times can limit dissolution in vivo (Source 8).“Dissolve” vs “melt”: some refutations address melting, but the relevant question is corrosion/dissolution rate and completeness under physiological conditions (Source 6).
Confidence: 7/10

Adjudication Summary

Source quality was strong (7/10) due to peer-reviewed experimental evidence from PubMed showing partial dissolution in simulated gastric juice. Logic was sound (7/10) as the evidence supports the stomach's chemical capability to dissolve razor blade material. However, context analysis scored lowest (5/10) because the claim omits crucial limitations: the supporting study was in vitro with prolonged exposure times, and real-world gastric residence times are much shorter, making complete dissolution unlikely in practice.

Consensus

The claim is
Misleading
6/10
Confidence: 8/10 Spread: 2 pts

Sources

Sources used in the analysis

SUPPORT
#2 Live Science 2018-09-27
REFUTE
#3 Oreate AI Blog 2026-01-07
NEUTRAL
#4 Fysiobasen 2025-10-05
NEUTRAL
#5 Science Info 2024-05-06
SUPPORT
#6 indianexpress.com 2023-06-12
REFUTE
#7 Grunge
SUPPORT
#8 LLM Background Knowledge
NEUTRAL
#9 Industry Tap 2016-02-03
SUPPORT