Fact-check any claim. Instantly. · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
“The Tyrannosaurus Rex lived closer in time to humans than to the Stegosaurus.”
The Conclusion
Executive Summary
The claim is mostly true. Stegosaurus lived ~150-155 million years ago, T. rex lived ~66-70 million years ago, creating an 80+ million year gap. This exceeds the 66 million years from T. rex to present day, making T. rex temporally closer to humans than to Stegosaurus.
Warnings
- Some sources incorrectly use the entire Late Cretaceous period (145-66 million years ago) as T. rex's lifespan, when T. rex actually lived only in the final few million years of that period
- The term 'humans' is imprecise - anatomically modern humans are much more recent than 66 million years ago, but the comparison uses present day as the reference point
The Claim
How we interpreted the user input
Intent
Verify a counterintuitive claim about the temporal relationships between dinosaur species and humans
Testable Claim
The user's input, neutralized and hardened into a testable hypothesis
“The Tyrannosaurus Rex lived closer in time to humans than to the Stegosaurus.”
The Research
What we found online
Summary of Findings
All sources are listed in the Sources section at the end of this report.
The Debate
The for and against arguments
Multiple authoritative sources confirm the temporal relationships: Source 1 (Natural History Museum) establishes Stegosaurus lived 150 million years ago, while Source 2 (EBSCO Research Starters) places T. rex at 70-66 million years ago, creating an 80+ million year gap between them that exceeds the 66 million years separating T. rex from modern humans. Source 11 (Did All the Dinosaurs Live Together) explicitly confirms this calculation, stating "the time separating Stegosaurus and Tyrannosaurus is greater than the time separating Tyrannosaurus and you," while Source 9 (YouTube) provides the precise mathematics showing 90 million years between the dinosaurs versus only 65 million years from T. rex to humans.
You conveniently ignored Source 3 (Springfield Museums) which states T. rex lived "about 145 to 66 million years ago," placing its earliest appearance just 5 million years after Stegosaurus went extinct - a timeline that completely undermines your 80+ million year gap calculation. Your reliance on YouTube sources and lower-authority websites while dismissing the Springfield Museums' contradictory evidence shows you're cherry-picking data that supports your predetermined conclusion rather than addressing the conflicting timelines that expose the mathematical inconsistency in this claim.
Source 3 (Springfield Museums) contradicts the claim by stating that T. rex lived during the late Cretaceous period "about 145 to 66 million years ago," which would place T. rex's earliest appearance at 145 million years ago - only 5-15 million years after Stegosaurus went extinct around 150 million years ago according to Source 1 (Natural History Museum) and Source 8 (Dinosaurs Rock Programs). This timeline compression means T. rex lived much closer to Stegosaurus (potentially just 5 million years apart) than to humans (66 million years apart), directly refuting the mathematical foundation of the claim.
You cherry-picked the earliest possible date from Source 3 (Springfield Museums) while ignoring that the same source and multiple others consistently place T. rex's actual existence at 68-66 million years ago, not 145 million years ago which marks the beginning of the entire Cretaceous period, not T. rex's appearance. Your selective interpretation contradicts Source 2 (EBSCO Research Starters), Source 4 (Fossilguy.com), and Source 5 (Oreate AI Blog) which all confirm T. rex lived specifically in the Late Cretaceous around 67-68 million years ago, maintaining the 80+ million year gap that proves the claim true.
Jump into a live chat with the Proponent and the Opponent. Challenge their reasoning, ask your own questions, and investigate this topic on your terms.
The Adjudication
How each panelist evaluated the evidence and arguments
The most reliable sources - Natural History Museum (0.75), EBSCO Research Starters (0.7), and multiple museum sources - consistently place Stegosaurus at 150-155 million years ago and T. rex specifically at 66-70 million years ago (not the broader 145-66 million year Cretaceous range), creating an 80+ million year gap that exceeds the 66 million years from T. rex to humans. The opponent's argument misinterprets Source 3's "145 to 66 million years ago" as T. rex's lifespan rather than the entire Late Cretaceous period, while the higher-authority sources confirm T. rex lived only in the final few million years of that period.
Sources 1 (Natural History Museum) and 2 (EBSCO Research Starters) place Stegosaurus at ~150 million years ago and T. rex at ~70–66 million years ago, implying an ~80+ million year separation, which is greater than the ~66 million years between T. rex and modern humans; Source 11 explicitly states this comparative relationship, so the inference to the claim is direct. The opponent's reliance on Source 3's “145 to 66 million years ago” as T. rex's lifespan is a scope/interpretation error (it conflates the Cretaceous period's span with T. rex's existence), so it does not logically rebut the claim; therefore the claim is true on the provided evidence.
The main missing context is that the claim depends on using the actual temporal range of T. rex (~70–66 million years ago per EBSCO Research Starters, and ~67–65 million years ago per Fossilguy.com) and Stegosaurus (~155–150 million years ago per Natural History Museum), while the opponent's “145–66 million years ago” from Springfield Museums is a period-wide Late Cretaceous range that misleadingly implies T. rex existed throughout it rather than only near the end. With that context restored, the overall impression is correct: the Stegosaurus–T. rex gap (~80–90 million years) is larger than the T. rex–present gap (~66 million years), so the claim is mostly true despite minor imprecision about what counts as “humans.”
Adjudication Summary
All three evaluation axes strongly supported the claim (scores 8-9/10). Source quality was high with reliable museum and academic sources providing consistent timeframes. Logic was sound with direct mathematical comparison of temporal gaps. Context analysis confirmed the core relationship holds despite minor imprecision about "humans." The main disagreement came from misinterpreting a broad geological period (145-66 Ma) as T. rex's specific lifespan.
Consensus
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
Lucky claim checks from the library
- Mostly “Underground freshwater reserves contain more water than all rivers and lakes combined.”
- False “The Bermuda Triangle is a region in the North Atlantic where ships and planes disappear at a rate that defies logical explanation.”
- False “Fortune cookies originated in China.”