Verify any claim · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
General“An iguana caused a power outage affecting the state of Anzoátegui, Venezuela.”
The conclusion
The claim is rooted in a real April 2010 incident in which Venezuela's state electricity company, Corpoelec, blamed an iguana for a power outage in Anzoátegui — but it overstates both the certainty and the scope. No independent source verified the iguana as the actual cause; the attribution is widely characterized as political scapegoating for systemic grid failures. The documented outage affected "10 sectors," not the entire state, making the unqualified phrasing materially misleading.
Based on 8 sources: 5 supporting, 1 refuting, 2 neutral.
Caveats
- The claim conflates official government attribution ('Corpoelec blamed an iguana') with independently verified causation — no technical or independent investigation confirmed the iguana was the actual cause.
- The best contemporaneous source describes an outage affecting '10 sectors' of Anzoátegui, not the entire state, making the claim's geographic scope an overstatement.
- Multiple sources frame the 'iguana' explanation as part of a broader pattern of Venezuelan officials using animal scapegoats to deflect from systemic electrical infrastructure failures.
Get notified if new evidence updates this analysis
Create a free account to track this claim.
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
The electrical crisis is not a meteorological phenomenon (El Niño) nor a zoological one (the iguana); it is a monument to corruption and incompetence.
In April 2010, a power outage occurred in Anzoátegui state that was caused, according to the National Electric Corporation (in the hands of chavismo), by an iguana that bit a high-tension cable causing the suspension of service.
Venezuelan authorities have repeatedly attributed power outages to animals, including iguanas, swallows, and opossums, between 2010 and 2012. The April 2010 Anzoátegui incident was one of the first and most widely documented cases where an iguana was officially blamed for a regional blackout.
An iguana left 10 sectors of Anzoátegui in darkness. Electricity failures that shake the territory leave families without power for several hours.
In April 2010, under the government of the late president Hugo Chávez, a service interruption in Anzoátegui state left 10 sectors without power, and Corpoelec blamed an iguana that bit a high-tension cable, causing the outage.
This balance refers to the first quarter of 2026. Starting in Guárico, on the night of December 31, 2025, military agents killed Manuel Alejandro Molletones Castillo... in Guárico and Anzoátegui, where security forces have combated them. No mention of any iguana-related power outage.
In Venezuela, the first was an iguana that attacked the electrical system. In 2010, in Anzoátegui state, an interruption left 10 sectors without power, and Corpoelec pointed to an iguana that bit a high-tension cable, causing the outage.
During a blackout that left half of Anzoátegui state without power, according to government officials, the animal consumed a high-tension cable. The video discusses how the government blamed iguanas and other animals for power outages as excuses.
What do you think of the claim?
Your challenge will appear immediately.
Challenge submitted!
Expert review
How each expert evaluated the evidence and arguments
Expert 1 — The Logic Examiner
Sources 2, 5, 7 (and arguably 8) establish that officials/Corpoelec attributed an April 2010 Anzoátegui outage to an iguana biting a high-tension cable, while Source 4 reports an iguana-caused outage affecting “10 sectors,” but none of these sources provides independent, technical verification that the iguana actually caused the failure, and the claim's scope (“affecting the state of Anzoátegui”) is broader than the best-specific evidence (“10 sectors”). Therefore the evidence supports that an iguana was blamed and that a localized outage occurred, but it does not logically warrant the stronger causal and statewide framing of the atomic claim, making the claim as stated misleading rather than proven true or false.
Expert 2 — The Context Analyst
The claim omits key qualifiers: most sources describe an official attribution (“Corpoelec blamed an iguana”) rather than independently verified causation, and the contemporaneous report specifies an outage affecting “10 sectors” rather than the whole state (Sources 4, 5, 7, 8). With full context, it's fair to say authorities reported an iguana-caused outage in Anzoátegui in April 2010, but the unqualified phrasing (“caused a power outage affecting the state”) overstates both certainty and scope, making the overall impression misleading (Sources 4, 5; critique context in Source 1).
Expert 3 — The Source Auditor
The most reliable sources here are Source 1 (El Nacional, high-authority Venezuelan outlet, 2026) and Source 2 (El Líbero, moderate-authority Chilean outlet, 2019); El Nacional explicitly frames the "iguana" narrative as a political scapegoat rather than a verified cause, while El Líbero and Sources 5 and 7 only report what Corpoelec attributed the outage to — not independently verified causation. The contemporaneous Source 4 (Mundo Inso, a low-authority WordPress blog from 2010) is the closest to a primary account but carries minimal evidentiary weight, and Sources 6 and 8 (YouTube) are among the weakest possible source types. The claim as stated — that an iguana "caused" a power outage affecting Anzoátegui — conflates official government attribution with verified causation; the most reliable source (El Nacional) directly challenges this framing as a political excuse, and no independent, high-authority source confirms the iguana as the actual physical cause, making the claim at best misleading in its assertion of causation rather than attribution.
Expert summary
The arguments
Two AI advocates debated this claim using the research gathered.
Argument for
Multiple independent sources corroborate that in April 2010, an iguana biting a high-tension cable caused a power outage affecting 10 sectors of Anzoátegui state, Venezuela, as officially reported by Corpoelec (the National Electric Corporation) — a fact documented contemporaneously by Source 4 (Mundo Inso) and confirmed by Source 2 (El Líbero), Source 5 (El Estímulo), and Source 7 (La Gran Aldea). The convergence of these sources, including the official attribution by Venezuela's own state electricity authority and the contemporaneous reporting from Source 4 dated April 8, 2010, establishes beyond reasonable doubt that an iguana did, in fact, cause a power outage affecting the state of Anzoátegui, Venezuela.
You're conflating “Corpoelec blamed an iguana” with “an iguana caused it,” but your own cited chain (Sources 2, 5, 7, 8) is explicitly attribution-based and therefore doesn't independently verify causation—this is an appeal to authority, not evidence. And you overstate the scope: the motion says an outage “affecting the state of Anzoátegui,” while the contemporaneous item you lean on (Source 4, Mundo Inso) only claims “10 sectors” were affected, and Source 1 (El Nacional) directly frames the “iguana” narrative as a scapegoat rather than a demonstrated cause.
Argument against
The only high-authority source in the brief directly rejects the “iguana blackout” narrative as a political excuse, stating Venezuela's electrical crisis is “not… a zoological one (the iguana)” but rooted in corruption and incompetence (Source 1, El Nacional). By contrast, the pro-claim items largely recycle what Corpoelec or officials “blamed” (Sources 2, 5, 7, 8) and a low-authority blog anecdote (Source 4), which shows attribution rather than verified causation—so the claim that an iguana actually caused an Anzoátegui outage is not credibly established.
Your reliance on Source 1 commits a category error: El Nacional is critiquing the systemic use of animal excuses to mask Venezuela's broader electrical crisis, not disputing the specific, documented April 2010 Anzoátegui incident — these are two entirely different claims, and conflating them is a classic straw man fallacy. Furthermore, you dismiss "attribution" as if it were mere speculation, but an official report by Corpoelec — the state electricity authority with direct operational knowledge — corroborated contemporaneously by Source 4's April 8, 2010 reporting and independently confirmed by Sources 2, 5, and 7 across different years and outlets, constitutes exactly the kind of multi-source evidentiary convergence that establishes factual credibility.