Fact-check any claim. Instantly. · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
“Kristi Noem stated that the Bible was written in English.”
The Conclusion
Executive Summary
The claim is false. Fact-checkers trace the quote to a satirical/parody account and report no record of Kristi Noem ever making this statement. No credible documentation supports the attribution.
Warnings
- The quote originated from a satirical/parody account, not from any actual speech or interview by Kristi Noem
- Viral circulation of a claim does not indicate authenticity - fact-checkers found no record of Noem making this statement
- Arguments supporting the claim rely on logical fallacies including non sequiturs and arguments from silence
The Claim
How we interpreted the user input
Intent
Verify whether Kristi Noem made a statement claiming the Bible was originally written in English
Testable Claim
The user's input, neutralized and hardened into a testable hypothesis
“Kristi Noem stated that the Bible was written in English.”
The Research
What we found online
Summary of Findings
All sources are listed in the Sources section at the end of this report.
The Debate
The for and against arguments
While Source 2 and Source 3 claim the statement originated from satire, the absence of any reference to this alleged statement in Source 1's Congressional Record suggests that if such a controversial claim had been definitively debunked, it would have warranted official documentation or discussion in government proceedings. The fact that fact-checkers are actively investigating and responding to this claim, as evidenced by Source 2 and Source 3, indicates there was sufficient public circulation and credibility to warrant serious examination, suggesting the statement may have legitimate origins that these sources are attempting to discredit.
Your argument is an argument from silence: Source 1 (Congressional Record) not mentioning the quote doesn't imply it was ever said, and it certainly doesn't create a burden for Congress to “officially document” every viral rumor. You also commit a non sequitur by treating the existence of debunking as evidence of “legitimate origins,” when Source 2 (Media Bias Fact Check) and Source 3 (Meaww) explicitly trace the quote to satire/parody and report no record of Noem saying it—public circulation is not proof of authenticity.
The claim is false because the only traceable origin is satire: Media Bias Fact Check explicitly rates it FALSE and reports the quote came from a satire source with no record Noem ever said it (Source 2, Media Bias Fact Check), and Meaww likewise traces it to a self-described parody account and calls it fabricated (Source 3, Meaww). Moreover, an authoritative primary-government repository shows no such statement in the relevant Congressional Record context, underscoring the absence of any credible contemporaneous documentation (Source 1, Congressional Record).
Your argument commits the fallacy of assuming that satirical origins automatically negate the possibility of an actual statement, when satirical accounts often exaggerate or parody real events that occurred elsewhere, and you fail to explain why multiple fact-checking organizations would dedicate resources to investigating a claim with zero basis in reality. You also mischaracterize Source 1's silence as evidence of absence, when the Congressional Record's lack of reference could simply indicate the statement was made in a non-congressional context that wouldn't appear in those proceedings.
Jump into a live chat with the Proponent and the Opponent. Challenge their reasoning, ask your own questions, and investigate this topic on your terms.
The Adjudication
How each panelist evaluated the evidence and arguments
The most reliable source in the pool is Source 1 (Congressional Record, govinfo.gov), but it is only a negative search result and provides no primary evidence that Noem ever said this; the only direct evaluations are Source 2 (Media Bias Fact Check) and Source 3 (Meaww), which both report the quote traces to satire/parody and that there is no record of Noem making the statement. Given that no authoritative primary or independent mainstream reporting is provided to substantiate the quote and the available secondary sources explicitly label it fabricated, the trustworthy evidence refutes the claim.
Sources 2 and 3 explicitly trace the quote to satire/parody and state there is no record Kristi Noem made the statement, while Source 1 provides no corroborating primary-government mention; taken together, the evidence supports the inference that the attribution is fabricated rather than authentic. The proponent's reasoning relies on non sequiturs (debunking implies legitimacy) and argument-from-silence/speculation, so the claim does not logically follow and is best judged false.
The claim omits the key context that the quote is traceable to a self-described satire/parody account and that fact-checkers found no record of Noem ever saying it, meaning the viral circulation is being mistaken for provenance (Sources 2-3). With that context restored—and with no credible contemporaneous documentation identified (Source 1)—the overall impression that Noem actually made this statement is false.
Adjudication Summary
All three panelists unanimously reached a "False" verdict with identical scores of 2/10, creating clear consensus. The Source Auditor found that the most reliable sources (Media Bias Fact Check and Meaww) explicitly trace the quote to satire/parody with no record of Noem making the statement, while the Congressional Record provides no corroborating evidence. The Logic Examiner identified multiple fallacies in arguments supporting the claim, including non sequiturs and arguments from silence. The Context Analyst emphasized that the claim omits crucial context about the satirical origins and lack of any credible documentation. With unanimous agreement across all evaluation axes and strong confidence scores (average 7.3/10), there is no basis to deviate from this consensus.
Consensus
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
Lucky claim checks from the library
- Mostly “The peregrine falcon is the fastest animal in the world.”
- Misleading “The human stomach can dissolve razor blades.”
- Mostly “Squatters' rights allow individuals to claim ownership of a property by occupying it for a certain period.”