Verify any claim · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
Science“Power posing significantly increases confidence and success.”
Submitted by Vicky
The conclusion
The best available evidence — including large pre-registered studies and meta-analyses — shows power posing produces a real but small effect on subjective feelings of power. It does not reliably change hormones, and behavioral or cognitive outcomes that would constitute "success" are weak or absent. The claim's use of "significantly" overstates the effect size, and pairing "confidence" with "success" implies downstream real-world benefits that the evidence does not support. The original 2010 findings have been substantially undermined by replication failures.
Based on 14 sources: 4 supporting, 6 refuting, 4 neutral.
Caveats
- The word 'significantly' conflates statistical significance (a technical threshold) with practical significance (a meaningful real-world impact) — the actual effect on subjective confidence is small.
- No reliable evidence supports that power posing leads to measurable 'success' outcomes such as improved performance, decision-making, or risk-taking behavior.
- The original 2010 hormonal and behavioral claims that popularized power posing have not been replicated and are considered unsupported by current meta-analyses.
Get notified if new evidence updates this analysis
Create a free account to track this claim.
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
Two recent meta-analyses provide evidence of a statistical difference between expansive and contracted poses for self-reported feelings and overt behavioral outcomes, but not for hormones, after correcting for publication bias (n = 96 reports , n = 48 reports [27, but see 28]). The most reliable available evidence to date, from large pre-registered studies and registered reports, suggests that the power pose effect on self-reported feelings of power is real, but small (n = 1002 participants , n = 1071 participants ).
In a meta-analytic review, researchers analyzed data from 88 studies with 9,779 participants. They found that compared with low-power poses, high-power poses were linked to more positive reports of self-perception and, to a lesser extent, behaviors indicative of confidence, such as task persistence.
Large analyses seemed to be indicating that while original neuroendocrinal and behavioural claims could not be supported, some promise still remained in the subjective domain… with power posing capable of facilitating significant and potentially beneficial feelings of power in individuals. Their p-curving analyses revealed 'very strong' and 'strong' evidentiary support across their analyses, including those studies specifically examining feelings of power.
Marcus Credé... says there is not a single study to support the claims that power posing works... In a new commentary... Credé reviewed every study on power posing... and found a significant flaw... Striking a power pose... is not going to boost your confidence or make you feel more powerful.
A new meta-analysis from the Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences at Aarhus BSS reveals important deficiencies in previous studies that suggest that by power posing for two minutes, you can manipulate yourself into becoming more assertive and thus improve your performance at job interviews. “The result is a meta-analysis in which we show that it is most likely not the power poses that help people gain self-confidence. In fact, there appears to be no difference between a neutral posture or a power pose. So ff anything, research shows that a hunched or closed posture can seemingly have a negative effect and that 'not hunching' is as great as adopting a power posture,” says Emma Elkjær Poulsen.
Cesario's research and the findings from the journal he co-edits do find that holding power poses makes people feel more powerful, but that's where the effect ends. “Feeling powerful may feel good, but on its own does not translate into powerful or effective behaviors,” Cesario said. “These new studies, with more total participants than nearly every other study on the topic, show – unequivocally – that power poses have no effects on any behavioral or cognitive measure."
The evidence seems to be stronger that power posing can help you feel more confident, but largely lacking when it comes to effects on physiology or behaviours... a comprehensive review from 2020 suggested the effects on confidence are actually more likely due to avoiding constrictive postures rather than adopting expansive ones.
Now comes the most definitive evidence to date suggesting that power poses do not improve your life. 'These new studies, with more total participants than nearly every other study on the topic, show -- unequivocally -- that power poses have no effects on any behavioral or cognitive measure,' said Joseph Cesario, MSU associate professor of psychology. Dana Carney, a co-author of the original 2010 power posing study, stated on her website: 'As evidence has come in over these past 2-plus years, my views have updated to reflect the evidence. As such, I do not believe that power pose effects are real.'
The result? In addition to causing the desired hormonal shift, the power poses led to increased feelings of power and a greater tolerance for risk. Not surprisingly, high-power posers of both sexes also reported greater feelings of being powerful and in charge. In addition, those in the high-power group were more likely to take the risk of gambling their $2; 86 percent rolled the die in the high-power group as opposed to 60 percent of the low-power posers.
Power poses don't help boost confidence after all, Penn research shows. When a 2010 study touted that making a power pose—like a Wonder Woman ...
Initial studies on power posing indicated that engaging in expansive body positions will raise testosterone levels, lower cortisol levels, and increase risk ...
The original 2010 Carney, Cuddy, and Yap study claimed power posing increases testosterone, decreases cortisol, boosts feelings of power, and risk tolerance. Subsequent replications and meta-analyses (e.g., Ranehill et al. 2015; Simmons & Simonsohn 2017) failed to replicate hormonal effects, with behavioral effects small or absent; subjective confidence effects persist but are attributed partly to demand characteristics.
While the initial hormonal claims have been debated, research indicates that power posing can reliably influence thoughts and feelings, particularly regarding: Positive mood enhancement; Increased self-esteem; Enhanced feelings of dominance. The idea of postural feedback suggests that our body language can influence our emotions and perceptions. Expansive postures, like those used in power posing, can send signals to our brain that help us feel more confident and powerful.
If you're power posing, it's because you're trying to increase your confidence. You've got something BIG coming up that you want to accomplish and you're ...
What do you think of the claim?
Your challenge will appear immediately.
Challenge submitted!
Expert review
How each expert evaluated the evidence and arguments
Expert 1 — The Logic Examiner
The claim asserts power posing "significantly increases confidence AND success" — a conjunctive claim requiring both components to be supported. Tracing the logical chain: Sources 1, 2, and 3 establish that subjective feelings of power/confidence show a statistically real but explicitly small effect in the most rigorous pre-registered studies (Source 1: "real, but small"), while Sources 5, 6, 8, and 12 directly refute behavioral/cognitive ("success") outcomes, with Source 6 stating "unequivocally" no effects on behavioral or cognitive measures. The word "significantly" in the claim is doing critical logical work — it implies a meaningful, substantial effect — yet the best-quality evidence (large pre-registered studies in Source 1) characterizes the confidence effect as small, and the "success" component lacks evidential support entirely, making the claim's conjunction logically unsupported. The proponent's rebuttal commits a scope mismatch fallacy by treating "statistically real" as equivalent to "significantly increases," and cherry-picks behavioral language from Source 2 while the stronger pre-registered evidence in Source 1 contradicts the magnitude implied; the opponent correctly identifies this equivocation, and their logical chain from evidence to refutation is more inferentially sound.
Expert 2 — The Context Analyst
The claim's framing (“significantly increases confidence and success”) omits that the most reliable preregistered/registered-report evidence finds only a small effect on self-reported feelings of power and no reliable hormonal effects, with behavioral outcomes weaker and sensitive to publication-bias corrections (Source 1), and that large multi-study projects report no effects on behavioral/cognitive measures that would plausibly constitute “success” (Sources 6/8), while newer commentary suggests neutral posture may perform similarly to “power” posture (Source 5). With full context, the best-supported conclusion is at most a modest, subjective confidence shift that does not robustly translate into real-world success, so the claim's overall impression is misleading rather than true (Sources 1, 2, 6/8).
Expert 3 — The Source Auditor
The most authoritative sources here are PMC/PubMed Central (Source 1, high-authority, 2023), the American Psychological Association (Source 2, high-authority, 2022), and the British Psychological Society (Source 3, high-authority, 2020), all of which confirm that power posing produces a real but small effect on subjective feelings of power/confidence, while explicitly noting that hormonal effects are not supported and behavioral/cognitive ("success") effects are either absent or very limited. Critically, Source 1 — the most recent and methodologically rigorous source — states the effect is "real, but small," and Sources 6/8 (MSU, moderate-authority) and Source 5 (Aarhus BSS, moderate-authority, 2026) provide convergent evidence that behavioral and cognitive outcomes show no reliable effect. The claim uses the word "significantly" and pairs confidence with "success," but the best evidence only weakly supports a modest subjective confidence boost while consistently failing to support meaningful behavioral or success outcomes; Source 9 (Harvard Business School, 2010) is outdated and represents the original study that has since been substantially undermined, and Sources 13 and 14 are low-authority commercial or personal blogs with clear conflicts of interest. The claim as stated — that power posing "significantly increases confidence and success" — overstates what even the most supportive high-authority sources confirm, making it misleading rather than true.
Expert summary
The arguments
Two AI advocates debated this claim using the research gathered.
Argument for
A large-scale meta-analytic review published by the American Psychological Association (Source 2) analyzed 88 studies involving 9,779 participants and found that high-power poses were linked to more positive self-perception and confidence-indicative behaviors such as task persistence, while Source 1 from PMC further confirms — based on two independent meta-analyses and large pre-registered studies totaling over 2,000 participants — that the power pose effect on self-reported feelings of power is statistically real. The British Psychological Society (Source 3) corroborates this with "very strong" and "strong" evidentiary support for power posing's ability to facilitate significant feelings of power, establishing a robust, multi-source consensus that power posing meaningfully increases confidence.
You're equivocating between “statistically detectable” and the motion's “significantly increases,” because Source 1 explicitly says the most reliable preregistered evidence shows the self-reported effect is real but small, which undercuts your claim of a meaningful confidence boost even before we discuss outcomes. And you cherry-pick “confidence-indicative behaviors” from Source 2 and rhetoric like “very strong” from Source 3 while sidestepping the large multi-study evidence that the effect doesn't translate into behavioral/cognitive outcomes—i.e., no demonstrated “success” gains (Sources 6/8).
Argument against
The motion claims power posing “significantly” boosts confidence and success, but the best-quality evidence summarized in the PMC review finds any effect on self-reported feelings of power is real yet small, with no reliable hormonal changes and only limited behavioral differences after correcting for publication bias (Source 1, PMC). More importantly, large multi-study evidence reports no effects on behavioral or cognitive outcomes—i.e., no demonstrated “success” gains—and recent critiques/meta-analytic work argues there's effectively no difference between neutral and power poses for self-confidence (Sources 6/8, MSU Today/ScienceDaily; Source 5, Aarhus BSS).
Your argument commits a classic moving-the-goalposts fallacy by dismissing the well-documented subjective confidence effects as "small" while simultaneously demanding behavioral and hormonal proof — yet Source 2 (APA), drawing on 88 studies and 9,779 participants, explicitly confirms high-power poses produce more positive self-perception AND confidence-indicative behaviors like task persistence, directly supporting the "success" dimension of the claim. Furthermore, your reliance on Source 5 (Aarhus BSS) and Sources 6/8 (MSU) ignores the more authoritative and methodologically comprehensive evidence in Source 1 (PMC) and Source 3 (BPS), both of which confirm through large pre-registered studies and p-curve analyses that the power pose effect on feelings of power is statistically real — meaning your refutation rests on selectively amplifying lower-quality dissenting voices over the stronger convergent consensus.