Library.

“Technology does not absolve individuals from accountability and can increase their responsibility in decision-making processes.”

Evidence from intergovernmental bodies, regulators, and recent research confirms that current governance norms keep humans legally and ethically responsible for technology-mediated decisions and that emerging rules often expand those duties. However, real-world cases show accountability can still be blurred, indicating the principle is not universally realized. The claim is largely accurate but somewhat overstates how consistently accountability is enforced.

“Statistics Sierra Leone has adopted ICT systems to manage national statistical records.”

Available evidence shows Statistics Sierra Leone uses ICT systems in multiple core functions, including digital census data collection, GIS-based statistical work, and maintaining a National Data Archive. UN documentation and the agency’s own technical materials describe operational digital infrastructure rather than purely aspirational plans. While some newer, centralized upgrades are still under development, the underlying claim of ICT adoption for managing statistical records is well supported.

“Problems attributed to technologies are often caused by underlying social issues in society rather than by the technology itself.”

The claim captures a real and well-supported insight — social context, governance, and usage patterns significantly shape technology outcomes — but frames it too one-sidedly. By stating problems are caused by social issues "rather than by the technology itself," it implies technology is a neutral vessel, which multiple high-authority medical and public health sources contradict. Platform design features like addictive engagement mechanics and algorithmic amplification are documented as independent contributors to harms such as youth mental health deterioration and political polarization. The reality is one of co-causation, not an either/or.

“Nuclear power has a lower mortality rate per unit of electricity generated than solar energy.”

The comparative safety of nuclear versus solar energy depends on which dataset and methodology is used, and the claim presents a contested ordering as settled fact. The most widely cited compilation (Our World in Data) places solar slightly lower than nuclear in deaths per terawatt-hour (0.02 vs. 0.03), while one peer-reviewed study reverses that ordering. Crucially, Our World in Data cautions that uncertainties at these very low mortality rates likely overlap, making any definitive ranking fragile.