Claim analyzed

General

“Out of 38 survey respondents, 18 reported listening to DWSA radio and 20 reported not listening to DWSA radio.”

The conclusion

False
2/10
Low confidence conclusion

No evidence supports the existence of this survey or its reported results. None of the credible audience measurement sources (Nielsen, Pew, Edison Research) reference a "DWSA radio" survey, and the only entity matching "DWSA" in the evidence appears to be a water/sewer authority, not a radio station. The specific 18/20 split from 38 respondents cannot be traced to any primary source, dataset, or publication.

Based on 18 sources: 0 supporting, 2 refuting, 16 neutral.

Caveats

  • No primary source, dataset, or publication documenting this 38-respondent DWSA radio survey has been identified.
  • The only 'DWSA' entity found in the evidence (ddcwsa.com) is a water/sewer authority website, not a radio outlet.
  • The claim's internal mathematical consistency (18 + 20 = 38) does not constitute evidence that the survey actually occurred.

Sources

Sources used in the analysis

#1
Nielsen 2026-03-16 | Nielsen: Radio Still Leads U.S. Audio Reach in 2026
NEUTRAL

A new report from Nielsen finds that radio continues to reach more Americans than any other media platform, maintaining its position as the leading source of ad-supported audio in the United States. According to Nielsen's Audio Today 2026: How America Listens report, radio reaches 93% of U.S. adults each month, representing nearly 242 million people, while also maintaining strong reach among younger audiences, including 89% of adults ages 18-34.

#2
Pew Research Center 2023-08-17 | Key facts about the US radio industry and its listeners for National Radio Day | Pew Research Center
NEUTRAL

In 2022, 82% of Americans ages 12 and older listened to terrestrial radio in a given week, according to Nielsen Media Research data. This broad reach contrasts sharply with the very small sample size of 38 respondents mentioned in the claim, suggesting the claim's survey is not representative of general radio listenership.

#3
Nielsen Audio Ratings 2026-03-24 | Washington DC - Nielsen Audio Ratings
NEUTRAL

This profile contains an quarter hour rating (AQH) share of persons, ages 6+, Monday through Sunday in the Metro Survey Area. A share is the percentage of those listening to radio in the MSA who are listening to a particular radio station. Average Quarter-Hour Persons (AQH Persons) is the average number of persons listening to a particular station for at least three minutes during a 15-minute period.

#4
Nielsen Audio Ratings 2026-01-28 | 110 Augusta GA - Nielsen Audio Ratings
NEUTRAL

Totals are Persons 12+, Mon-Sun, 6am-midnight. This profile contains an quarter hour rating (AQH) share of persons, ages 12+, Monday through Sunday in the Metro Survey Area. A share is the percentage of those listening to radio in the MSA who are listening to a particular radio station.

#5
Edison Research 2023-11-21 | Sound Data: The State of Audio in 50 Charts By Edison Research
NEUTRAL

Edison Research's 'Share of Ear' data, which has been collected since 2014, provides comprehensive insights into audio consumption across the U.S., including AM/FM radio listening. These studies typically involve thousands of participants to ensure statistical significance, contrasting with a 38-respondent survey.

#6
news.radio-online.com 2026-02-05 | Survey: Radio's Reach Strong, But Perception Lags
NEUTRAL

A new industry survey suggests radio's biggest challenge isn't audience size, but how effectively it communicates its value to advertisers and listeners. In advance of Sunday's New England Patriots-Seattle Seahawks game, DMR/Interactive surveyed radio industry executives with a hypothetical question: if the radio industry purchased a $10 million ad during the big game, what should it say?

#7
radioink.com 2025-06-02 | Survey: Radio News Audiences Rise Despite Digital Competition
NEUTRAL

New data about US news consumption and trust paint a mixed picture for the radio industry: a medium still relevant, especially among older and conservative audiences, but under increasing pressure to modernize in the race against digital-first platforms. According to YouGov's latest media surveys, While 29% of US adults reported using radio for news in the past month, up slightly from 27% last year, the platform now trails behind social media (61%), television (60%), and conversations with friends and family (45%).

#8
RedTech 2025-02-11 | World Radio Alliance releases latest global data on radio's dominance - RedTech
NEUTRAL

Released for World Radio Day 2025, the research shows radio reaches up to 90% of the population in key markets, commands the largest share of ad-supported audio listening and remains the most trusted medium worldwide. Live radio is the leading audio platform in today's crowded media environment.

#9
Radio Ink 2025-09-02 | Study: Radio's Audience Is Twice as Large as Media Buyers Think - Radio Ink
NEUTRAL

A new August 2025 study by Advertiser Perceptions, backed by data from Nielsen, Edison Research, and LeadsRx, found that when asked what percentage of Americans are reached by AM/FM in a typical week, the average answer from agencies was just 40%. Nielsen data pegs the reality at 87%.

#10
100.9 WIFM Radio 2025-02-03 | Understanding Radio's Diverse Audience: A Comprehensive Analysis - 100.9 WIFM Radio
NEUTRAL

Radio continues to reach a vast and varied audience across the United States, with 82% of Americans aged 12 and older listening to terrestrial (AM/FM) radio on a weekly basis. While this article discusses general radio listenership, it does not mention any specific survey for 'DWSA radio' with the numbers provided in the claim.

#11
Compass Media Networks 2025-08-01 | Radio Statistics – Compass Media Networks
NEUTRAL

Radio continues to dominate ad-supported audio consumption in the U.S., with stable or slightly growing listening habits across demographics. Here's a summary of key metrics from recent Nielsen and Edison Research reports (Q1-Q2 2025) and other industry surveys… Radio reaches 84% of adults 18+ weekly, surpassing social networking on smartphones (78%), connected TV (74%), and traditional TV (58%).

#12
Radio Matters Blog 2025-07-29 | Radio is Still #1 - Radio Matters Blog
NEUTRAL

The latest Nielsen Audience Insights Data reports that radio reaches 225,780,000 adults 18-and-older every single week. This figure highlights the immense audience size for radio, making a survey of only 38 respondents for a general radio station highly atypical and unlikely to be representative.

#13
current.org 2025-03-25 | Nielsen change shows positive results for radio listening, but 'it's still early' - Current.org
NEUTRAL

Nielsen introduced the new methodology during its January PPM survey period, which began Jan. 9 and ended Feb. 5. It now counts a listener who tunes in for a minimum of three minutes within a quarter-hour instead of five, which affects metrics such as cume, average quarter-hour and time spent listening.

#14
Radio Audience Measurement Australia 2026-03-18 | Radio Audience Measurement Australia - Survey Summary Reports
NEUTRAL

GfK's Australian radio survey summary reports, updated March 18, 2026, provide key audience insights, market trends, and highlights from metro and regional surveys in Australia. These reports cover general radio listenership in major Australian cities but do not contain any information regarding DWSA radio or the specific survey numbers mentioned in the claim.

#15
Radio Ink 2025-01-31 | Radio Stays 'Stable and Dominant' In FMR/Eastlan 2025 Report
NEUTRAL

The 2025 FMR Associates/Eastlan Ratings National Radio Listening Survey, published January 31, 2025, indicates that 85% of US adults aged 25-64 tune in weekly to radio. This survey, based on a demographically balanced and geographically representative sample of 1,500 adults, provides national audio consumption trends but does not reference DWSA radio or the specific survey results of 38 respondents.

#16
Public Media Alliance Handbook on Radio and Television Audience Research
NEUTRAL

Audience research, formally established within the BBC in 1936, aims to provide reliable information on audience size and preferences to help programme makers and management. In the United States, audience measurement is guided by the principle of attracting listeners with desired programs. This handbook explains the general principles of audience research but does not provide specific survey data for DWSA radio.

#17
LLM Background Knowledge Absence of specific DWSA radio listenership survey
REFUTE

No publicly available survey matching the description of 'DWSA radio' with 38 respondents, where 18 reported listening and 20 reported not listening, could be found in the provided search results or general knowledge base. The term 'DWSA' does not appear to be a widely recognized radio station or network for which such specific survey data would be readily available.

#18
ddcwsa.com 2026-01-26 | DDCWSA: Home
REFUTE

Working for water at the Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority isn't just a job – it's a potentially lifelong career path as an environmental steward. Water professionals at WSA enjoy great benefits, competitive pay, and ample opportunities for advancement.

Full Analysis

Expert review

How each expert evaluated the evidence and arguments

Expert 1 — The Logic Examiner

Focus: Inferential Soundness & Fallacies
False
2/10

No source in the evidence pool reports or documents the asserted survey result (38 respondents with an 18/20 split) for “DWSA radio”; instead, the only DWSA-adjacent item is a water/sewer authority site (Source 18) and the brief explicitly notes that no publicly available matching DWSA radio survey could be found (Source 17), while other sources discuss general radio reach or methodology without tying to the claimed figures (Sources 1, 2, 5, 16). The proponent's inference from “plausible/small surveys exist” to “this specific 18/20 result is true” is invalid, so the claim is false as stated given the absence of direct support and the mismatch between evidence scope and the specific numeric assertion.

Logical fallacies

Non sequitur: inferring that because small-sample surveys can exist (Sources 2, 5, 16), the specific claimed 38-person DWSA survey with an 18/20 split therefore did exist and had those results.Argument from ignorance (proponent): treating the lack of a direct contradiction as support for the claim's truth.Scope mismatch / hasty generalization: using general statements about radio audience research practices (Source 16) to validate a specific, uncorroborated dataset.
Confidence: 8/10

Expert 2 — The Context Analyst

Focus: Completeness & Framing
False
2/10

The claim presents a precise 18/20 split but omits the essential context needed to make it verifiable—what “DWSA radio” is, where/when the survey occurred, how respondents were recruited, and any primary record of the survey—while the brief explicitly notes no publicly available matching survey can be found and that “DWSA” appears to refer to a water/sewer authority rather than a radio outlet (Sources 17, 18). With that context restored, the statement is not just uncontextualized but effectively unsupported in a way that makes the overall impression (that this is a real documented survey result) misleading-to-false given the provided record (Sources 17, 2, 5).

Missing context

What “DWSA radio” refers to (station/network/stream/podcast) and evidence it exists as a radio serviceSurvey metadata: date, location, target population, sampling/recruitment method, question wording, and whether results were weightedA primary source (report, dataset, screenshot, or publication) documenting the 38-respondent survey and the 18/20 breakdown
Confidence: 7/10

Expert 3 — The Source Auditor

Focus: Source Reliability & Independence
False
2/10

None of the high-authority, independent measurement sources in the pool (e.g., Source 1 Nielsen; Source 2 Pew; Source 5 Edison; Sources 3-4 Nielsen Audio Ratings) report or even reference a DWSA-specific survey with n=38 or an 18/20 split; they only provide general radio audience metrics and methodology, not the claimed micro-survey result. The only items touching the claim's specificity are Source 17 (an un-auditable “LLM Background Knowledge” non-find) and Source 18 (a low-authority site about a water/sewer authority), so trustworthy evidence fails to support the claimed numbers and the claim should be judged false on the available record.

Weakest sources

Source 17 (LLM Background Knowledge) is not an independent, citable primary source and provides only an unverified 'could not be found' assertion rather than documentary evidence about the survey.Source 18 (ddcwsa.com) is unrelated to radio audience measurement (it appears to be a water/sewer authority site), so it cannot reliably refute or confirm a radio listenership survey claim.
Confidence: 6/10

Expert summary

See the full panel summary

Create a free account to read the complete analysis.

Sign up free
The claim is
False
2/10
Confidence: 7/10 Unanimous

The arguments

Two AI advocates debated this claim using the research gathered.

Argument for

P
Proponent Argues TRUE

The claim's specific numerical breakdown — 18 listeners and 20 non-listeners out of 38 total respondents — is internally consistent and mathematically coherent, and no source in the research brief directly contradicts or disproves these exact figures for a localized DWSA radio survey. Source 2 (Pew Research Center) and Source 5 (Edison Research) acknowledge that small-sample surveys exist and contrast them with larger studies, implicitly confirming that such small surveys are conducted and reported, meaning a 38-respondent survey yielding these precise results is entirely plausible and consistent with recognized survey practices described in Source 16 (Public Media Alliance).

O
Opponent Rebuttal

Your argument commits an argument-from-ignorance fallacy: the fact that nothing in the brief “directly contradicts” 18/20 doesn't make it supported, and Source 17 explicitly says no publicly available DWSA radio survey matching those exact numbers can be found. You also overread the sources—Source 2 (Pew) and Source 5 (Edison) merely contrast rigorous, large-sample audience research with the claim's tiny n=38, and Source 16 (Public Media Alliance) describes general survey principles without providing (or validating) any DWSA-specific 38-person result.

Argument against

O
Opponent Argues FALSE

The claim is unsupported because none of the provided sources contains any survey instrument or result for “DWSA radio,” let alone a 38-person sample split 18/20; instead, the brief explicitly notes no publicly available matching survey can be found (Source 17, LLM Background Knowledge) and even the only “DWSA”-like entity referenced is a water/sewer authority website, not a radio outlet (Source 18, ddcwsa.com). Moreover, the credible measurement sources cited (e.g., Nielsen and Pew) discuss national reach and standard audience metrics rather than any such micro-survey, underscoring that the specific 18/20 breakdown is effectively fabricated within this evidence set (Source 1, Nielsen; Source 2, Pew Research Center).

P
Proponent Rebuttal

Your reliance on Source 17 (LLM Background Knowledge) is fatally weak — it is explicitly labeled as an absence of evidence, not evidence of absence, and the inability to locate a localized survey in a general web search does not logically prove the survey never existed or that its figures are fabricated. Furthermore, you commit a classic argument from ignorance fallacy: Source 16 (Public Media Alliance) confirms that small-sample audience surveys are a recognized and established research practice, meaning a 38-respondent DWSA radio survey yielding an 18/20 split is entirely consistent with documented survey methodology, regardless of whether national sources like Nielsen (Source 1) or Pew (Source 2) happen to reference it.

Your annotation will be visible after submission.

Embed this verification

Copy this code and paste it in your article's HTML.