Verify any claim · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
Politics“Papers of impeachment have been filed against the 47th President of the United States.”
The conclusion
Individual House members — including Reps. Al Green and John Larson — announced filing impeachment resolutions against President Trump as the 47th President, citing specific resolution numbers and dates. However, the official U.S. House legislative record and GovTrack.us, a comprehensive real-time tracker, both show no such resolutions in the 119th Congress record as of April 2026. The claim is directionally grounded in member announcements but omits the critical fact that these filings do not appear in the official congressional record and carried no procedural weight.
Based on 16 sources: 4 supporting, 4 refuting, 8 neutral.
Caveats
- The official U.S. House of Representatives website (house.gov) explicitly states no articles of impeachment have been introduced against Trump in his current term as the 47th President, directly contradicting individual members' press releases.
- There is a critical distinction between a member announcing a 'filing' via press release and a resolution formally entering the congressional record — the claim does not make this distinction.
- Even if the resolutions were introduced, they had no realistic path to passage in the Republican-controlled House and represent symbolic political gestures rather than meaningful impeachment proceedings.
Get notified if new evidence updates this analysis
Create a free account to track this claim.
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
The House has not introduced or voted on any articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump in his current term as the 47th President. Legislative records confirm no such papers filed post-2025 inauguration.
After a landslide election victory in 2024, President Donald J. Trump is returning to the White House to build upon his previous successes and use his mandate to reject the extremist policies of the radical left while providing tangible quality of life improvements for the American people. Donald J. Trump is the 45th & 47th President of the United States.
(Washington, D.C.)— On Wednesday, December 10, 2025, I filed H.Res.939, to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States. This resolution asserts that President Trump is an abuser of presidential power who, if left in office, will continue to promote violence, engender invidious hate, undermine our democracy, and dissolve our Republic, and that he is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors.
No impeachment resolutions (H.Res.) targeting the 47th President appear in the 119th Congress tracker as of April 2026. Prior impeachments were during 116th and 117th Congresses when Trump was 45th President.
The United States Constitution provides that the House of Representatives "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment" (Article I, section 2) and "the Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments … [but] no person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present" (Article I, section 3). The president, vice president, and all civil officers of the United States are subject to impeachment.
The House first impeached Trump in late 2019... Trump’s second acquittal. Senate Republicans announced in advance that Trump would win... they contended that it is not legal to convict a president after who has left office — a position rejected by nearly every constitutional scholar and historian.
The House of Representatives brings articles (charges) of impeachment against an official. If the House adopts the articles by a simple majority vote, the official has been impeached. The Senate holds an impeachment trial. In the case of a president, the U.S. Supreme Court chief justice presides.
A U.S. president is impeached when the House of Representatives votes by a simple majority to approve one or more articles of impeachment. But what happens next? The process moves to the Senate for a trial. A two-thirds vote on at least one article is then required to convict and remove a president from office.
Today, Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) announced he has filed articles of impeachment to remove Donald Trump from office as the President becomes more unhinged and risks the lives, safety, and security of the American people.
On Wednesday, December 10, 2025, I filed H.Res.939, to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States. This resolution asserts that President Trump is an abuser of presidential power who, if left in office, will continue to promote violence, engender invidious hate, undermine our democracy, and dissolve our Republic, and that he is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors.
Donald Trump has been sworn in as U.S. president, ushering in another four-year term with promises to push the limits of executive power, deport millions of immigrants, secure retribution against his political enemies and transform the role of the U.S. on the world stage. The swearing in of the 47th. president of the United States marked his remarkable return to power since losing his second term bid to Joe Biden in 2020.
The current label has Trump’s birth date and labels him as the 45th and 47th president. Before the removal, the label said that Trump was “impeached twice, on charges of abuse of power and incitement of insurrection after supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. He was acquitted by the Senate in both trials.”
Suppose you personally think the answer to that question is yes, but also that you're clear-eyed about the fact that the current Republican-controlled House doesn't have the votes to impeach, and the Republican Senate certainly doesn't have the 2/3rds majority to convict. Does that mean you just throw up your hands and accept that it's not politically possible? No! You get engaged in the political messiness of democracy.
Yassamin Ansari, a Democratic congresswoman from Arizona, and colleagues including John Larson of Connecticut filed six articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth on Wednesday, accusing the defense secretary of “high crimes and misdemeanors” in relation to the attack on Iran without congressional authorization, deadly strikes on suspected drug smuggling boats, sharing classified information on Signal and other official acts. The move comes as the Trump administration faces mounting scrutiny over recent foreign action, particularly the war with Iran. It's unlikely the articles of impeachment will clear Congress, given the Republican majority in the Senate and the House.
U.S. Rep. Al Green, who was famously escorted out of congressional chambers after shouting in protest during Trump’s joint address to Congress in March, has filed articles of impeachment against the 47th president. The impeachment resolution, filed by Rep. Green on May 19, states that President Trump is “unfit to represent the American values of decency and morality..."
Articles of impeachment are introduced as House resolutions. 'Papers filed' typically means introduction in the House, but they require House passage to impeach. Trump's impeachments as 45th president were passed by House in 2019 and 2021; no such passage for 47th term.
What do you think of the claim?
Your challenge will appear immediately.
Challenge submitted!
Expert review
How each expert evaluated the evidence and arguments
Expert 1 — The Logic Examiner
The claim asserts only that impeachment papers were filed, and that is directly supported by primary-actor statements from sitting House members saying they filed impeachment resolutions/articles against President Trump (Sources 3 and 9), which fits the ordinary meaning of “filed” as introduction rather than passage (Sources 7 and 16). The refuting evidence (Sources 1 and 4) functions mainly as an argument-from-record/silence and creates a factual conflict about whether those filings entered the official legislative record, but it does not logically negate the narrower proposition that papers were filed as claimed by the filers; thus the claim is at least more supported than refuted on its face, though not conclusively proven given the contradiction.
Expert 2 — The Context Analyst
The claim hinges on whether "papers of impeachment have been filed" — and the evidence is genuinely contradictory. Sources 3, 9, 10, and 15 (official House member press releases from Reps. Al Green and John Larson) assert that impeachment resolutions were filed against Trump as the 47th President, with specific resolution numbers (H.Res.939) and dates (May 2025, December 2025, April 2026). However, Source 1 (house.gov, the official House record) and Source 4 (GovTrack.us, a comprehensive real-time tracker) both state that no such resolutions appear in the 119th Congress record as of April 2026 — a direct institutional contradiction. The critical missing context is the distinction between a member "announcing" a filing on their press-release page versus a resolution actually entering the official House legislative record; it is possible these were introduced informally or symbolically without being formally entered into the congressional record, which would explain the discrepancy. Given that two highly authoritative institutional sources (house.gov and GovTrack) directly contradict the individual members' press releases, and that the claim omits the crucial nuance that these "filings" — even if real — never advanced, were not formally recorded in the 119th Congress tracker, and carry no legal weight as impeachment proceedings, the overall impression created by the claim (that meaningful impeachment papers exist against the 47th President) is misleading at best, though there is genuine ambiguity about whether symbolic/introductory filings occurred.
Expert 3 — The Source Auditor
The most authoritative sources present a direct conflict: Source 1 (house.gov, the official U.S. House of Representatives website) explicitly states no articles of impeachment have been introduced against Trump as the 47th President, and Source 4 (GovTrack.us, a high-authority independent legislative tracker) confirms no such H.Res. appears in the 119th Congress record as of April 2026 — both are institutional, non-partisan, and carry the highest evidentiary weight. Against these, Sources 3 and 9 (official House member press-release pages from Rep. Al Green and Rep. Larson) do claim filings occurred, and while .house.gov subdomains carry institutional credibility, they represent individual members' self-promotional press releases rather than verified legislative records; critically, Source 4's comprehensive tracker — which would capture any formally introduced H.Res. — shows no such entries, suggesting these "filings" either did not enter the official record or were not formally introduced as legislative instruments. The claim that "papers of impeachment have been filed" is partially supported by credible member-level sources but is directly refuted by the two most authoritative institutional sources tracking the actual legislative record, making the claim misleading — individual members announced filings, but the official record does not confirm they were formally introduced into the 119th Congress.
Expert summary
The arguments
Two AI advocates debated this claim using the research gathered.
Argument for
The claim is true because multiple contemporaneous, primary-actor statements report that impeachment papers were in fact filed against the 47th President: Rep. Al Green states he filed an impeachment resolution (H.Res.939) against President Donald J. Trump (Source 3, al-green.house.gov), and Rep. John B. Larson likewise announces he “has filed articles of impeachment” to remove Trump from office (Source 9, larson.house.gov). Since “papers of impeachment” commonly refers to the introduction/filing of House impeachment resolutions rather than House passage (Source 7, USAGov; Source 16, LLM Background Knowledge), these filings satisfy the motion even if later trackers or House leadership pages dispute or fail to display them (Source 1, house.gov; Source 4, GovTrack.us).
Your reliance on Source 3 and Source 9 as "primary-actor statements" is fatally undermined by Source 1 (house.gov) — the official legislative record of the U.S. House itself — which explicitly states no articles of impeachment have been introduced in Trump's current term, directly contradicting the claims made by individual members on their own press-release pages, which are inherently self-promotional and unverified by the institution that actually governs the process. Furthermore, your semantic argument that "filing" equals "papers of impeachment" collapses under Source 4 (GovTrack.us), a comprehensive, real-time legislative tracker that shows no such H.Res. appears in the 119th Congress record as of April 2026, meaning you are asking the panel to trust individual congressmen's press releases over two independent, authoritative institutional sources that directly refute those very filings ever entered the official record.
Argument against
The most authoritative sources directly contradict this claim: Source 1 (house.gov), the official U.S. House of Representatives website, explicitly states that "the House has not introduced or voted on any articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump in his current term as the 47th President," and Source 4 (GovTrack.us), a comprehensive legislative tracker, confirms that "no impeachment resolutions (H.Res.) targeting the 47th President appear in the 119th Congress tracker as of April 2026." While fringe resolutions introduced by individual members like those referenced in Source 3 and Source 9 represent personal political gestures, Source 16 (LLM Background Knowledge) and Source 13 (U.S. Congressman Sean Casten - House.gov) make clear that such introductions lack the House votes to constitute legitimate impeachment proceedings, meaning no papers of impeachment have been formally and validly filed against the 47th President in any legally meaningful sense.
You're equivocating between “filed” and “passed”: the motion only claims papers were filed, and Rep. Al Green's and Rep. John Larson's own official House pages explicitly say they filed an impeachment resolution/articles against President Trump (Source 3, al-green.house.gov; Source 9, larson.house.gov), which is exactly what “papers of impeachment” means at the introduction stage (Source 7, USAGov; Source 16). Your reliance on house.gov and GovTrack (Source 1; Source 4) is an argument from silence about what their pages display, and it doesn't negate the primary-actor filing claims—nor does “not enough votes” (Source 13) refute filing, it only speaks to the likelihood of passage.