Verify any claim · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
General“The article titled 'Karakteristik Fisik dan Kimiawi Serta Teknik Konservasi Naskah Lontar' was published in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, a journal affiliated with Universitas Gadjah Mada.”
The conclusion
The journal's affiliation with Universitas Gadjah Mada is well-documented, but no available evidence confirms the specific article titled "Karakteristik Fisik dan Kimiawi Serta Teknik Konservasi Naskah Lontar" was ever published in it. Multiple authoritative databases and the journal's own site fail to surface any bibliographic record — no volume, issue, authors, or DOI — for this title. Topical plausibility and the possibility that unindexed archives might contain it do not constitute verification of publication.
Based on 15 sources: 7 supporting, 0 refuting, 8 neutral.
Caveats
- No bibliographic record (volume, issue, authors, DOI, or article URL) for the claimed article title exists in any of the evidence sources reviewed.
- The proponent's reasoning relies on an argument from ignorance — treating the possibility that the article 'may exist' in unindexed archives as evidence of publication.
- Only the journal's UGM affiliation is confirmed; the article's existence in that journal is entirely unverified.
Get notified if new evidence updates this analysis
Create a free account to track this claim.
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, with registered number ISSN 1693-7740 (print), ISSN 2477-0361 (online) is a national accredited scientific multidisciplinary journal published by Perpustakaan Universitas Gadjah Mada.
BIP (Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi), with registered number ISSN 1693-7740 (print), ISSN 2477-0361 (online) is a scientific multidisciplinary journal published by Perpustakaan Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Perpustakaan Universitas Gadjah Mada Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Vol 22 No 1 (2026): June (In Press).
Perpustakaan dan Arsip Universitas Gadjah Mada Bulaksumur, Kotak Pos 16, Yogyakarta 55281. Principal Contact Sri Junandi, Perpustakaan dan Arsip Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Indonesian Ministry of Education repository on technical guidelines for lontar manuscript care, noting their hygroscopic nature and sensitivity to climate. No connection to the specific article title or UGM journal.
Penerbit, UPT Perpustakaan UGM : Yogyakarta., 2012. No. Panggil 020.5 MAD Vol.VIII.No.1 2012 C.1, confirming publication by UPT Perpustakaan UGM (Universitas Gadjah Mada).
This article discusses Bibliometrics which was used to analyse 80 articles published in journal Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi (BIP) from 2014 to ..., confirming it as an established journal.
This is a thesis from Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) repository studying the effectiveness of techniques and materials for conserving lontar manuscripts, testing 44 substances like clove oil, glycerin-ethanol mixtures against damage factors such as high temperature, humidity, insects. No mention of an article titled 'Karakteristik Fisik dan Kimiawi Serta Teknik Konservasi Naskah Lontar' or Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi.
Jurnal Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Sebagai Bentuk Maksimalisasi Komunikasi Informasi: Analisis Knowledge Management Jurnal Ilmiah Online, published by Universitas Diponegoro, referencing BIP as a recognized journal from UGM.
Article from Universitas Airlangga's Record and Library Journal on preservation and conservation efforts at Museum Lontar Gedong Kirtya, including special storage, temperature control, chemical cleaning. Does not mention the claimed article title or Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi from UGM.
Proceedings paper on techniques for preserving and cataloging ancient manuscripts by the Library and Archival Service. Does not reference the claimed article or its journal.
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is a real journal published by Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), focusing on library and information science. However, no widely documented article exactly matching 'Karakteristik Fisik dan Kimiawi Serta Teknik Konservasi Naskah Lontar' appears in standard searches or known indices; it may exist in archives not surfaced here.
Document on Scribd about preservation, conservation, and restoration of lontar collections in Bali's Culture Department, covering policies, storage, physical maintenance with silica gel, restoration techniques. No evidence of the specific article or UGM journal affiliation.
PDF on the role of conservation and preservation for ancient manuscript information media, emphasizing physical and digital maintenance. Absent any support for the claimed publication details.
PDF on strategies and challenges in manuscript preservation, including physical storage, fumigation, encapsulation. No evidence found for the article in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi.
What do you think of the claim?
Your challenge will appear immediately.
Challenge submitted!
Expert review
How each expert evaluated the evidence and arguments
Expert 1 — The Logic Examiner
Sources 1–4 and 6 logically establish that Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi (BIP) is published by (and thus affiliated with) Universitas Gadjah Mada, but none of the provided sources actually links the specific article title “Karakteristik Fisik dan Kimiawi Serta Teknik Konservasi Naskah Lontar” to BIP (no article page, citation, volume/issue, DOI, or index entry), so the evidence does not reach the claim's full conjunction (article-in-that-journal + UGM affiliation). Because the dataset proves only the journal-affiliation half while leaving the publication-of-that-titled-article unproven (and the proponent's “may exist”/topic-fit reasoning is non-deductive), the claim as stated is not established and is best judged false on inferential grounds.
Expert 2 — The Context Analyst
The claim conflates two separate propositions—(a) that BIP is UGM-affiliated (well supported by the journal's own pages and SINTA) and (b) that a specific article with the exact title was published in BIP—yet the evidence pool provides no direct bibliographic record (issue/volume, authors, DOI, or a BIP article page) for that title, and even notes it is not found in standard indices (Sources 1–4, 12). With the missing publication-specific context restored, the overall impression (“this particular titled article was published in that UGM journal”) is not established and is effectively false as stated.
Expert 3 — The Source Auditor
High-authority institutional and government-index sources (Source 1 journal.ugm.ac.id; Source 2 BIP site; Source 3 SINTA) reliably establish that Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is published by Universitas Gadjah Mada's library, but none of the provided sources contains an independent bibliographic record showing the specific article title “Karakteristik Fisik dan Kimiawi Serta Teknik Konservasi Naskah Lontar” was published in that journal. Because the claim asserts a specific article-publication fact that is not supported by any trustworthy, direct citation in the evidence pool (and Source 12 only speculates it “may exist”), the claim is false as stated despite the journal's UGM affiliation being well-supported.
Expert summary
The arguments
Two AI advocates debated this claim using the research gathered.
Argument for
The claim is strongly supported by the unambiguous affiliation of Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi with Universitas Gadjah Mada, confirmed by multiple highly authoritative sources including Source 1 (journal.ugm.ac.id), Source 2 (Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Submissions page), Source 3 (SINTA - Science and Technology Index), and Source 6 (Digilib STSRD Visi Indonesia), all of which consistently identify the journal as published by Perpustakaan Universitas Gadjah Mada. Furthermore, Source 12 (LLM Background Knowledge) explicitly acknowledges that an article matching 'Karakteristik Fisik dan Kimiawi Serta Teknik Konservasi Naskah Lontar' "may exist in archives not surfaced here," meaning the absence of a direct citation in the research brief reflects indexing limitations rather than non-existence, and the journal's well-documented focus on library and information science — including manuscript-related topics as evidenced by Source 8 (etd.repository.ugm.ac.id) — makes it the natural and credible venue for such a publication.
You're proving only the journal's UGM affiliation (Sources 1–4, 6), not the motion's actual hinge—that the specific article with that exact title was published in BIP—because you still provide no article record (no BIP URL, volume/issue, authors, DOI) and Source 3 doesn't mention the title at all. Your fallback to Source 12's “may exist” and to topical plausibility via an unrelated UGM thesis (Source 8) is an argument from ignorance plus non sequitur: possibility and subject-matter fit don't establish publication, so the claim remains unsupported and therefore false as stated.
Argument against
The brief establishes that Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is indeed a UGM-affiliated journal (Sources 1–4, 6), but it provides zero direct evidence that an article titled “Karakteristik Fisik dan Kimiawi Serta Teknik Konservasi Naskah Lontar” was ever published in it—no issue/volume, author list, DOI, or journal page is cited anywhere. Multiple relevant repositories and preservation-focused papers (Sources 5, 8, 10, 11, 13–15) likewise fail to mention this exact title, and even the background note flags that the article is not found in standard indices (Source 12), making the publication claim unsupported and therefore false as stated.
Your argument commits a classic argument from ignorance fallacy — you treat the absence of indexing as proof of non-publication, yet Source 12 explicitly concedes the article "may exist in archives not surfaced here," meaning your entire case rests on the assumption that unindexed equals unpublished, which is logically untenable for a journal with decades of archived print volumes. Furthermore, you misrepresent the burden of proof: the claim is that the article was published in a UGM-affiliated journal, and Sources 1, 2, 3, and 6 unanimously and authoritatively confirm that Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is exactly that — so the journal's affiliation, which is the core of the claim, is fully established, while your reliance on neutral, tangentially related sources (Sources 5, 10, 13–15) that were never expected to index this specific article adds no genuine evidentiary weight against the claim.