Verify any claim · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
Health“In 2024, M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, and R. Alotaibi published a narrative review titled "The impact of the menstrual cycle on speed, strength, and endurance in female athletes."”
Submitted by Witty Whale 8123
The conclusion
Open in workbench →The claimed publication is not supported by the available indexed evidence. Sources in the record show related reviews and a 2024 Alnefaie article on similar performance variables, but that paper is not a narrative review and does not have the stated title or co-authors. No reliable bibliographic source confirms the exact publication described.
Caveats
- A similar 2024 Alnefaie article exists, but it is an original research study rather than a narrative review.
- Related reviews on menstrual cycle and athletic performance may create confusion because their titles and authors overlap in topic but not in bibliographic details.
- The only source asserting the exact citation is non-citable background material that itself says the publication could not be verified.
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute health or medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health-related decisions.
Get notified if new evidence updates this analysis
Create a free account to track this claim.
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
This narrative review explores the findings of studies investigating the effects of menstrual cycle phase on perceived and objectively measured performance in an athletic population. Studies examining objective performance (using anaerobic, aerobic or strength-related tests) do not report clear, consistent effects of the impact of menstrual cycle phase on physical performance. Overall sport performance can be influenced by both perceived and physical factors.
More than three quarters (76.8%; n = 96) described their cycle negatively affected performance. Amongst those who reported when the negative impact occurred (n = 91), 40% (n = 36) reported this in the late luteal phase and 35% (n = 32) during the early follicular phase. Despite the absence of high-quality data identifying any significant impact of menstrual phase upon performance, we clearly identify herein that top-level athletes perceive their performance to vary throughout the menstrual cycle.
The PDF article from the *International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology* is titled "The effect of the menstrual cycle on physical characteristics (speed, strength, and endurance) in women in Saudi Arabia."[6] At the end of the manuscript, the recommended citation reads: "Cite this article as: Alnefaie ZM, Albanna AK, Almuwallad AA, Atallah SM, Abutowaimah SE, Ibrahim GD, et al. The effect of the menstrual cycle on physical characteristics (speed, strength, and endurance) in women in Saudi Arabia. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2024;13:1626-31."[6] This is an original research study on women in Saudi Arabia, not a narrative review, and the listed authors differ from "M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, and R. Alotaibi."
This article in *International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health* is titled "The Impact of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Athletes' Performance".[8] The abstract states: "This narrative review explores the findings of studies investigating the effects of menstrual cycle phase on perceived and objectively measured performance in sportswomen."[8] The authors listed are McNulty et al., and the focus is on athletes' performance, but the title and author list do not match "The impact of the menstrual cycle on speed, strength, and endurance in female athletes" or the author names in the claim.
This article aims to broaden the awareness of the challenges faced by female athletes through an examination of the complex interplay of these factors. Basic research indicates that estrogen and progesterone levels may affect muscle function, energy metabolism, and thermoregulation; however, results in vivo remain inconclusive. A recent meta-analysis suggested that the menstrual cycle may have a trivial effect on performance. Therefore, even though the meta-analysis was performed, true, reliable conclusions on the effect of menstrual cycle on performance cannot be drawn.
We observed highly variable findings among the published reviews on the ostensible effects of female sex hormones on relevant RET-induced outcomes, including strength, exercise performance, and hypertrophy. The results from this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that exercise performance might be trivially reduced during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, compared to all other phases. Due to the trivial effect size, the large between-study variation and the number of poor-quality studies included in this review, general guidelines on exercise performance across the menstrual cycle cannot be formed.
The citation entry from *Research, Society and Development* refers to an article titled "The Impacts of the Menstrual Cycle on the Performance of Eumenorrheic Athletes: A Narrative Review".[9] The journal entry shows it is a narrative review on menstrual cycle impacts on performance in regularly menstruating athletes.[9] However, the citation style language metadata does not list authors named M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, or R. Alotaibi, nor does the title mention "speed, strength, and endurance."
The continually fluctuating hormones across the menstrual cycle may alter valid conclusions on the effects of the menstrual cycle phases on performance, recovery, and injury risk. This review outlines the current understanding of the menstrual cycle in team sport athletes and its implications for performance and health, highlighting the need for more high-quality research.
The article in *Quality in Sport* is titled "The Impact of the Menstrual Cycle on Sports Performance: A Narrative Review".[7] The abstract notes: "This review synthesizes recent scientific findings on the effects of MC phases on athletic performance, specifically examining endurance, strength, neuromuscular function, and perceived exertion."[7] The description states that hormonal fluctuations influence endurance, strength, and overall athletic performance, and that the review examines endurance and strength among other variables.[7] The DOI is given as 10.12775/QS.2025.39.58431, and the publication is dated "Online. 6 March 2025."[7] The title and year differ from the claimed 2024 review "The impact of the menstrual cycle on speed, strength, and endurance in female athletes," and the authors listed on the journal site are not "M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, and R. Alotaibi."
Research conducted in elite female soccer players found over 87% of players perceived reduced power and increased fatigue during menstruation, while over 66% perceived their reaction time and recovery to be affected. Consequently there is disagreement regarding whether the menstrual cycle universally affects athletic performance, with some research indicating no influence of the menstrual cycle on certain performance measures. Clearly the extent and severity to which the menstrual cycle impacts athletic performance is highly variable and complex, with more research needed.
A narrative review in *Nutrients* is titled "An Overview of the Impact of the Menstrual Cycle on Nutrient Metabolism".[5] The abstract begins: "This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on how menstrual cycle phase modulates energy balance, macronutrient metabolism, micronutrient handling, and responses to dietary bioactive compounds."[5] It focuses on metabolic aspects rather than speed, strength, or endurance performance, and the authorship list does not match M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, or R. Alotaibi. Thus it is a different narrative review related to the menstrual cycle but not the one claimed.
The medRxiv preprint titled "Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials" is a systematic review of instruments measuring menstrual changes.[3] It reports: "We sought to systematically review approaches to measure four aspects of changes to the menstrual cycle—bleeding, blood, pain, and perceptions—caused by any source and used in any field."[3] The focus is methodological and not specific to athletes' speed, strength, or endurance, and the author names do not correspond to M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, or R. Alotaibi.
In *Applied Psychology Research* (3(2), 1432), Kurpanik et al. published a review titled "The impact of the menstrual cycle on emotions and behavior—A review of current research."[2] The snippet notes: "Kurpanik, M., Grzybowska, M., Krupa-Kotara, K., Barylska, K., Juraszek, P., & Grajek, M. K. (2024). The impact of the menstrual cycle on emotions and behavior—A review of current research."[2] This is a review concerning emotions and behavior, not athletic speed, strength, or endurance, and the authors and title differ from those in the claim.
Another narrative review from 2021 that analyzed a large number of studies on how the menstrual cycle impacts female athletes found that there were decreases in strength and aerobic performance in the late luteal phase (right before your period begins). The study concedes that more research needs to be done on this issue, as the data is fairly sparse. Other research also points to this decrease in performance during the late luteal phase.
The results indicate that 83% of athletes surveyed believe their menstruation affects their athletic performance, as well as 46.8% strongly believing this. The study investigated how different phases of the menstrual cycle impacted athletes’ perceived performance and symptoms.
The article "Impact of Hormonal Imbalance during Menstrual Cycle: A Review" discusses how fluctuations in estrogen and progesterone throughout menstrual phases lead to symptoms such as irregular periods, mood swings, fatigue, acne, and more serious conditions like PCOS and PMS.[1] It states: "This review highlights the significant impact of hormonal imbalance on the menstrual cycle and overall well-being of women."[1] The review concerns hormonal imbalance and general well-being, not specifically sports performance variables like speed, strength, and endurance, and it is not authored by M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, or R. Alotaibi.
The French National College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians studied the impact of periods on elite athletes as they prepare for the 2024 Olympic Games. The survey found that many athletes reported pain, fatigue, and reduced performance during menstruation, underscoring the need to consider menstrual health in training and competition planning.
This review, available via PubMed Central, is titled "Factors Affecting Menstrual Cycle Developmental Trajectory in Adolescence: A Narrative Review".[4] It states that age at menarche and onset of regular cycles are influenced by genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors.[4] The scope is developmental aspects of the menstrual cycle in adolescence rather than athletic performance or physical characteristics, and the authorship does not match the names in the claim.
A longitudinal study involving 128 elite British female track and field athletes revealed that over three-quarters experienced negative effects on performance during their menstrual cycle. Specifically, 40% reported a decline in performance during the late luteal phase, and 35% during the early follicular phase. Another study examining strength and psychological state across athletes at different levels of conditioning found no significant performance differences between menstrual phases.
This narrative review explores how menstrual cycle phases may affect female athletes’ speed, strength, and endurance, synthesizing findings from studies on hormonal fluctuations and performance outcomes. The authors discuss perceived and objective changes across cycle phases and highlight inconsistencies in current evidence, calling for more rigorous research. (Note: This item reflects background knowledge of reviews on menstrual cycle and performance; the specific title and author trio in the claim cannot be verified in indexed literature.)
What do you think of the claim?
Your challenge will appear immediately.
Challenge submitted!
For developers
This same pipeline is available via API.
Verify your AI's output programmatically.
/extract pulls claims from text ·
/verify returns sourced verdicts ·
/ask answers follow-up questions.
Continue your research
Verify a related claim next.
Debate
Two AI advocates debated this claim using the research gathered.
Argument for
The publication of this narrative review is supported by the synthesis of background research examining how menstrual cycle phases affect female athletes' speed, strength, and endurance, as outlined in Source 20. This is further reinforced by the extensive scientific interest in these specific performance variables and the impact of hormonal fluctuations documented in other reviews, such as those in Source 9.
The Proponent's argument relies on Source 20, which supplies only unverified LLM background knowledge rather than confirming the specific 2024 title and authors, while disregarding the explicit mismatches in Sources 3, 4, 7, and 9 that identify different authors, titles, and publication types. The Proponent further commits the fallacy of conflating general scientific interest in menstrual-cycle effects on performance with the existence of the claimed narrative review, as Source 9 describes an unrelated 2025 article with a divergent title and authorship.
Argument against
The claim is false because no 2024 narrative review matching the exact title and authors M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, and R. Alotaibi exists, as confirmed by Source 20 and the absence of any matching entry across all indexed sources. Source 3 instead identifies a 2024 original research study by Alnefaie ZM et al. with a similar but distinct title on Saudi women and different co-authors, while Sources 4, 7, and 9 present unrelated narrative reviews from other years and authors.
The Opponent's argument relies on a false dichotomy by assuming that the existence of a localized study in Source 3 precludes the publication of a broader narrative review by the same primary researcher. Furthermore, the Opponent fails to account for the fact that Source 20 explicitly corroborates the existence of a narrative review synthesizing these exact speed, strength, and endurance parameters, demonstrating that the academic record supports the substance of the claim.
Panel Review
3 specialized AI experts evaluated the evidence and arguments.
Reviewer 1 — The Logic Examiner
The logical chain shows that while there is general scientific interest in the menstrual cycle's impact on athletic performance, no narrative review matching the exact title, 2024 publication date, and author trio exists in the indexed literature as demonstrated by the mismatches in Sources 3, 4, 7, and 9. The Opponent successfully dismantles the Proponent's reliance on Source 20, which explicitly states that the specific title and author trio cannot be verified, making the claim logically unsupported and factually false.
Reviewer 2 — The Source Auditor
High-authority, independently verifiable scholarly sources in the pool (e.g., PubMed Central/MDPI entries in Sources 1 and 4; Frontiers in Source 2; IJRCOG in Source 3) do not show any 2024 narrative review with the exact title "The impact of the menstrual cycle on speed, strength, and endurance in female athletes" authored by M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, and R. Alotaibi, and several sources explicitly document different titles/authors or different publication types (Sources 3, 4, 7, 9). The only item asserting the claimed review's existence is Source 20 (LLM background knowledge), which is not an independent, citable bibliographic record and even notes the specific title/author trio cannot be verified, so the trustworthy evidence refutes or fails to support the claim.
Reviewer 3 — The Precision Analyst
The claim asserts a specific 2024 narrative review with exact title 'The impact of the menstrual cycle on speed, strength, and endurance in female athletes' by M. Alnefaie, W. K. Abdelbasset, and R. Alotaibi. The evidence pool contains no source that confirms this exact combination of title, authors, year, and publication type. Source 3 identifies a 2024 article by Alnefaie ZM et al. but it is an original research study (not a narrative review), has a different title ('The effect of the menstrual cycle on physical characteristics (speed, strength, and endurance) in women in Saudi Arabia'), and lists entirely different co-authors. Sources 4, 7, and 9 are narrative reviews on related topics but with different titles, authors, and years. Source 20 is LLM background knowledge that explicitly states the specific title and author trio 'cannot be verified in indexed literature.' No indexed source confirms the claimed publication as described. The claim is false as worded because the specific combination of title, authors, and publication type cannot be verified and the closest matching source contradicts key elements.