Verify any claim · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
Health“Power posing increases confidence and success.”
Submitted by Vicky
The conclusion
Open in workbench →The claim overstates the evidence. While some studies find a small effect on self-reported feelings of confidence, this effect is modest and likely partly driven by participant expectations. The "success" component is not supported — multiple meta-analyses and replication studies find near-zero behavioral effect sizes. The original hormonal claims (testosterone/cortisol changes) were publicly disavowed by a co-author in 2016 after repeated replication failures. The research field has been significantly impacted by the replication crisis.
Caveats
- The 'success' component of the claim lacks robust empirical support — controlled studies find near-zero effect sizes on behavior and real-world outcomes.
- Any confidence effect is described in the literature as small and likely partly driven by demand effects (participants guessing what researchers expect) and publication bias.
- The original 2010 hormonal findings were publicly disavowed by co-author Dana Carney in 2016 due to repeated replication failures, undermining the physiological basis of the claim.
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute health or medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health-related decisions.
Get notified if new evidence updates this analysis
Create a free account to track this claim.
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
Two recent meta-analyses provide evidence of a statistical difference between expansive and contracted poses for self-reported feelings and overt behavioral outcomes, but not for hormones, after correcting for publication bias (n = 96 reports , n = 48 reports [27, but see 28]). The most reliable available evidence to date, from large pre-registered studies and registered reports, suggests that the power pose effect on self-reported feelings of power is real, but small (n = 1002 participants , n = 1071 participants ). Still, it seems likely that the effect arises partly from demand effects [15, 30, 31], and that publication bias remains an issue in the field [15, 32].
Two recent meta‐analyses have synthesized the existing evidence on differences between expansive and contractive displays and found significant differences across studies on self‐reported and behavioral outcomes but no significant differences across studies on hormones and physiological outcomes (Elkjær et al. 2022a; Körner et al. 2022). However, Körner et al. (2022) concluded that the effects on behavioral outcomes were not robust. The results showed no effect of body displays on behavior (d = 0.06) nor affect (ds = 0.02–0.06).
Large analyses seemed to be indicating that while original neuroendocrinal and behavioural claims could not be supported, some promise still remained in the subjective domain… with power posing capable of facilitating significant and potentially beneficial feelings of power in individuals.
Striking a powerful pose makes people feel more confident—and maybe even behave more confidently—according to research in Psychological Bulletin. In a meta-analytic review, researchers analyzed data about the impact of body position on self-confidence, behavior in various tasks, and physiology from 88 studies with 9,779 participants. They found that compared with low-power poses (e.g., slumped posture), high-power poses (e.g., standing upright with arms raised) were linked to more positive reports of self-confidence.
A new meta-analysis from the Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences at Aarhus BSS reveals important deficiencies in previous studies that suggest that by power posing for two minutes, you can manipulate yourself into becoming more assertive and thus improve your performance at job interviews. “The result is a meta-analysis in which we show that it is most likely not the power poses that help people gain self-confidence. In fact, there appears to be no difference between a neutral posture or a power pose.”
To summarise a complex debate, the evidence seems to be stronger that power posing can help you feel more confident, but largely lacking when it comes to effects on physiology or behaviours, such as taking more risks. Just to complicate matters further, a comprehensive review from 2020 suggested the effects on confidence are actually more likely due to avoiding constrictive postures rather than adopting expansive ones.
Striking a power pose before an important meeting or interview is not going to boost your confidence or make you feel more powerful, says an Iowa State University researcher. Marcus Credé, an associate professor of psychology at Iowa State, says there is not a single study to support the claims that power posing works. Nearly all of the studies he reviewed were poorly designed and failed to compare power poses to normal poses.
Apicella and Smith attempted to replicate the original power pose study by Dana Carney, Amy Cuddy and Andy Yap... The Penn researchers found no support for any of the original effects, what's called embodied cognition, results they published recently in Hormones and Behavior. The current findings are not the only to suggest that the effects of power posing are not real, adding to the evidence that has accumulated since the 2010 study.
Cesario's research and the findings from the journal he co-edits do find that holding power poses makes people feel more powerful, but that's where the effect ends. “Feeling powerful may feel good, but on its own does not translate into powerful or effective behaviors,” Cesario said. “These new studies, with more total participants than nearly every other study on the topic, show – unequivocally – that power poses have no effects on any behavioral or cognitive measure.”
Power poses don't help boost confidence after all, Penn research shows. When a 2010 study touted that making a power pose—like a Wonder Woman ...
Holding one's body in "high-power" poses for short time periods can summon an extra surge of power and sense of well-being when it's needed. The result? In addition to causing the desired hormonal shift, the power poses led to increased feelings of power and a greater tolerance for risk.
Initial studies on power posing indicated that engaging in expansive body positions will raise testosterone levels, lower cortisol levels, and increase risk ...
A two-minute power pose can help boost your performance, whether it is to excel in a job interview, nail a presentation or get leverage in critical negotiations, according to Harvard professor and social psychologist Amy Cuddy. Her research shows that our body language not only affects how others see us, but how we see ourselves. By holding our bodies in a position of power, our hormones react immediately — our testosterone goes up and our cortisol goes down — resulting in calm confidence that we feel and others experience.
Researchers Dana Carney and Andy Yap of Columbia University and Amy Cuddy from Harvard University decided to find out just how powerful the power pose really is. Their findings, according to Psychology Today, found that those who held the power position for two minutes or more had greater feelings of power and confidence with higher levels of the dominance hormone and lower levels of the stress hormone. In an article in the Harvard Business Review written by Cuddy, she explains power poses increase people's tolerance for risk and pain, and their ability to think abstractly.
Amy Cuddy's 2010 study with Carney and Yap claimed power posing increased testosterone, decreased cortisol, boosted feelings of power, and risk-taking. Dana Carney publicly disavowed the hormonal findings in 2016 due to failed replications. Multiple meta-analyses (e.g., 2020 by Landes et al.) found small effects on self-reported confidence but no reliable hormonal or behavioral changes leading to success.
By standing in a power pose for just a few minutes, we can potentially boost our confidence and lower our stress levels. Amy Cuddy and her colleagues conducted a study in 2010 that found participants who adopted high-power poses for two minutes had increased testosterone levels and decreased cortisol levels. Other attempts to replicate Cuddy's results have been inconsistent. Despite mixed scientific results, many people report feeling more confident and less anxious after practicing power poses.
What do you think of the claim?
Your challenge will appear immediately.
Challenge submitted!
For developers
This same pipeline is available via API.
Verify your AI's output programmatically.
/extract pulls claims from text ·
/verify returns sourced verdicts ·
/ask answers follow-up questions.
Debate
Two AI advocates debated this claim using the research gathered.
Argument for
Multiple high-authority sources confirm that power posing increases confidence: Source 4 (American Psychological Association) reports a large meta-analytic review of 88 studies with 9,779 participants finding that high-power poses were linked to significantly more positive self-confidence reports, while Source 1 (PubMed Central) corroborates this with two independent meta-analyses and large pre-registered studies totaling over 2,000 participants confirming that "the power pose effect on self-reported feelings of power is real." Source 3 (British Psychological Society) further affirms that power posing can "facilitate significant and potentially beneficial feelings of power," and since confidence is a well-established predictor of performance and success across domains, the convergent evidence from these independent, peer-reviewed sources strongly supports the claim that power posing increases confidence and, by extension, success.
You're trying to smuggle “success” in through a correlation: even if power posing slightly shifts self-reported feelings, Source 2 (PMC, “The Power of Posing”) explicitly finds no effect on behavior or affect in daily life and notes behavioral effects aren't robust, so your “confidence → success” leap is a classic non sequitur. And your own cited Source 1 (PMC, “Power pose effects…”) undercuts your certainty by stressing the effect is small and likely partly demand/publication-bias driven, meaning the best evidence supports at most a modest, possibly expectancy-based feeling change—not increased real-world success.
Argument against
The motion claims power posing increases “confidence and success,” but the best-controlled evidence summarized in a daily-life registered study finds essentially no effect on behavior or affect (d≈0.06 and ds≈0.02–0.06), and meta-analytic conclusions specifically note behavioral effects are not robust (Source 2, PMC: “The Power of Posing”). Even where small self-reported “feelings of power” effects appear, they're described as small and likely driven partly by demand effects and publication bias (Source 1, PubMed Central: “Power pose effects…”), while multiple replication-focused reports conclude any feeling boost does not translate into effective behavior—undercutting the “success” part of the claim (Source 9, MSU Today; Source 8, Penn Today).
Your argument commits a scope fallacy by conflating "success" exclusively with behavioral outcomes, ignoring that Source 4 (American Psychological Association) — drawing on 88 studies with 9,779 participants — directly links power posing to increased self-confidence, which is itself a well-established psychological precursor to successful performance, meaning you cannot dismiss the confidence-to-success pathway simply by pointing to weak hormonal or risk-taking data. Furthermore, your reliance on Source 2's near-zero effect sizes (d≈0.06) cherry-picks a single daily-life study while sidestepping the convergent findings of Source 1 (PubMed Central) and Source 3 (British Psychological Society), both of which — using large pre-registered samples exceeding 2,000 participants — affirm that the self-reported feelings-of-power effect is real, meaning the preponderance of high-authority peer-reviewed evidence still supports the claim as stated.
Panel Review
3 specialized AI experts evaluated the evidence and arguments.
Reviewer 1 — The Logic Examiner
The claim bundles two distinct assertions — that power posing increases (1) confidence and (2) success — and the evidence only partially supports the first while largely refuting the second. Sources 1, 3, 4, and 6 converge on a small but real effect on self-reported feelings of power/confidence, yet Sources 1 and 2 explicitly note these effects are small, likely partly demand-driven, and do not extend to behavioral or physiological outcomes; Sources 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 15 collectively show no reliable translation into behavioral change or real-world success, making the proponent's "confidence → success" inferential leap an unsupported non sequitur. The claim as stated is therefore misleading: the confidence sub-claim has modest, contested support, but the "success" sub-claim lacks logical grounding in the evidence, and the original hormonal/behavioral claims that underpinned the popular "success" narrative have been substantially disconfirmed.
Reviewer 2 — The Context Analyst
The claim bundles two distinct assertions — that power posing increases "confidence" AND "success" — without distinguishing between them. The evidence pool reveals a critical split: there is modest, real (though small and partly demand-effect-driven) support for subjective feelings of confidence/power (Sources 1, 3, 4), but the hormonal claims (testosterone/cortisol) from the original 2010 study have been largely disavowed (Source 15), and behavioral/real-world success outcomes show near-zero effect sizes (d≈0.06, Sources 2, 9). The claim omits that (a) the original co-author Dana Carney publicly disavowed the hormonal findings, (b) any confidence effect is small and possibly driven by demand effects and publication bias, (c) the "success" component lacks robust empirical support, and (d) the claim conflates a weak subjective feeling with actual performance outcomes. The overall impression created — that power posing is a reliable tool for boosting both confidence and success — is misleading because it overstates the evidence, particularly on the "success" side, and ignores the replication crisis surrounding this research.
Reviewer 3 — The Source Auditor
The highest-authority sources (Source 1, PMC, 2023; Source 2, PMC, 2025; Source 4, APA, 2022; Source 3, BPS, 2022) converge on a nuanced picture: power posing produces a small, real effect on self-reported feelings of confidence/power, but no reliable hormonal changes and no robust behavioral outcomes — meaning the "success" component of the claim is unsupported by the best evidence. Source 1 (PMC) explicitly notes the effect is "real, but small" and likely partly driven by demand effects and publication bias; Source 2 (PMC, the most recent high-authority source) finds near-zero effect sizes on behavior (d=0.06) and affect (ds=0.02–0.06) in daily life; Source 4 (APA) supports a confidence-feeling link but does not establish success; Sources 7–10 (university press offices citing peer-reviewed work) and Source 9 (MSU) state behavioral effects are absent. The claim as stated — that power posing increases both "confidence AND success" — is therefore misleading: the confidence component has weak but real support, while the success component is refuted by the most reliable and recent evidence, and the original hormonal claims (Sources 11, 13, 14, 16) have been largely disavowed.