Verify any claim · lenz.io
Claim analyzed
Health“Technostress is psychological stress caused by the use of information and communication technologies.”
Submitted by Calm Tiger f138
The conclusion
The claim matches the dominant academic definition. Across peer-reviewed and authoritative sources, technostress is generally described as psychological stress or strain that arises from interacting with ICTs. Some authors add physiological symptoms or emphasize difficulty coping with ICT demands, but those are refinements, not contradictions.
Caveats
- Some definitions include physiological as well as psychological responses, so the concept can be broader than mental stress alone.
- The phrase "caused by ICT use" is a simplification; many sources more specifically point to overload, complexity, constant connectivity, and inability to cope with ICT demands.
- A minority view argues technostress may overlap with broader occupational stress rather than being a completely distinct form of stress.
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute health or medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health-related decisions.
Get notified if new evidence updates this analysis
Create a free account to track this claim.
Sources
Sources used in the analysis
Technostress (TS), defined as "stress experienced by end users in organizations as a result of their use of ICT" (pp. 417–418), is one major "dark side" of using ICT in the workplace. Specifically, technostress occurs when an individual has a negative evaluation of their experience when carrying out tasks using technology at work and is distinct from studies of general work stress. Brod also defined technostress as ineffective coping with technology that results in distress.
The term technostress was coined by Brod and defined as a modern adaptive disease, caused by the lack of ability to deal with new technologies in a healthy way. It is directly related to the negative psychosocial effects of the use of ICTs. From this perspective, technostress clearly refers to psychological stress responses arising from interaction with information and communication technologies.
Technostress is generally defined as stress that individuals experience due to their use of information and communication technologies (ICTs). It encompasses psychological strain reactions such as anxiety, fatigue, and feelings of overload that arise from ICT-related demands, complexity, and constant connectivity.
Technostress describes individuals’ psychological and physiological reactions due to their perception that they cannot handle ICT demands effectively in the work [14, 20]. It is usually considered the ‘dark-side’ of ICT usage. People who have to use technology frequently and heavily in their work are likely be exposed to technostress.
Technostress has been defined as the stress that users experience due to the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) at work. It encompasses negative psychological states such as anxiety, fatigue, and cognitive overload that arise from constant connectivity, information overload, and ICT complexity.
Researchers use the term “technostress” to describe the strain some people experience from constant connectivity, digital monitoring, and rapidly changing information and communication technologies. These ICT-related pressures can contribute to psychological stress reactions, including anxiety, irritability, and burnout symptoms.
Occupational stress is defined as stress resulting from employment‑related factors (e.g., work overload, role conflict, lack of autonomy). Technology use or demands related to information and communication technologies may be among the sources of such stress, but the entry does not define a separate construct of 'technostress'.
Psychologists use the term "technostress" to describe the negative psychological impact of technology use, particularly when it is constant and intrusive. However, some experts argue that what people report as technostress is often a manifestation of broader work stressors—such as workload or lack of control—that happen to be mediated through digital tools, rather than a distinct condition caused solely by information and communication technologies.
The review revealed that technostress is a multidimensional construct that encompasses various cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and physiological responses to the use of information and communication technologies (ICT). It manifests itself as both a physiological and psychological state generated by the omnipresence of technology in one's daily work life. This experience is related to feelings of anxiety, mental fatigue, skepticism, and inefficiency.
Technostress is a condition characterized by stress-related physical, mental, or emotional symptoms arising from the use of technology, such as computers, smartphones, and tablets. *Technostress* is any stress-related physical, mental, or emotional condition caused by the use of technology. Experts say that technostress results when people feel overwhelmed by the presence of technology in their lives or when they begin to feel technology is taking over their lives.
The term technostress first appeared in Craig Brod's book (Brod, 1984) titled *Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution*. The term refers to one's inability to cope with technology that results in distress. At present, scientific research on technostress reveals that the negative psychological relationship with technology presents itself mainly in two different ways: people have a hard time understanding new technology (techno-anxiety), or they identify excessively with it (techno-addiction).
In 1984, the term "technostress" was coined to define stress, anxiety and mental health problems related to the use of new computer technologies. This stress is generated in several ways: information overload, digital isolation, confusion due to complex interfaces, insecurity and uncertainty, or the feeling of having to be constantly connected. ICT makes work easier, but it can also be stressful and even harmful to health.
More recent research has defined technostress as a situation where the use of ICT at work induces stress symptoms as an on-going process. In these definitions technostress is seen as a strain reaction resulting from the use of information and communication technologies rather than a personality trait.
According to Craig Brod (1984), technostress, or stress caused by technology, is defined as the negative psychological impact of technology on people. He defines it as "an emerging psychological disorder induced by an individual's inability to adapt effectively to new technologies." If we focus on the work environment, Salanova et al. (2013) proposed a definition of the experience of technostress at work as a "negative psychological state associated with the use or threat of use of ICT in the future. This experience is related to feelings of anxiety, mental fatigue, skepticism and ineffectiveness."
Technostress, as given in the name, is a form of stress that stems from the rise in the use of technology. As defined by the American Psychological Association, it is a form of occupational stress which is deeply rooted in the use of Information and Communication Technologies such as the Internet, our mobile phones, or computers. Aside from it being stress from the use of technology, technostress can also stem from the inability to cope with the use of or the struggle in adapting to technology and new technological advancements.
Some organizational and health psychologists argue that technostress is not a fundamentally new type of psychological stress but rather traditional work or life stress manifesting through digital tools. In this view, information and communication technologies are seen as a context or medium for existing stressors (such as workload, time pressure or role conflict), rather than the primary cause of a unique psychological condition.
What do you think of the claim?
Your challenge will appear immediately.
Challenge submitted!
Continue your research
Verify a related claim next.
Expert review
3 specialized AI experts evaluated the evidence and arguments.
Expert 1 — The Logic Examiner
The evidence pool overwhelmingly and consistently defines technostress as psychological stress arising from the use of information and communication technologies, with Sources 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, and 14 all directly supporting this definitional claim from peer-reviewed and authoritative outlets; the opponent's objections — that physiological symptoms are also included (Sources 4, 9, 10) and that some experts view ICTs as merely mediating broader stressors (Source 8, Source 16) — do not logically refute the claim, since psychological stress canonically encompasses somatic manifestations, and the minority causal-mediation view is a nuanced academic debate about etiology rather than a contradiction of the core definitional claim that ICT use is the proximate stressor. The claim is therefore logically well-supported: the evidence directly and consistently proves that technostress is defined as psychological stress caused by ICT use, with only minor scope issues around the inclusion of physiological dimensions and a minority dissenting view on causal framing that does not overturn the dominant consensus.
Expert 2 — The Context Analyst
The claim accurately reflects the dominant academic definition (stress/strain responses arising from the use of ICTs), but it omits that many definitions treat technostress as multidimensional (often including physiological reactions) and sometimes emphasize perceived inability to cope with ICT demands rather than ICT use alone, and there is noted debate about whether it is distinct from broader work stressors merely mediated by digital tools (Sources 4, 8, 9, 10). With that context restored, the statement still gives a largely correct overall impression as a shorthand definition, though its simple “caused by” framing is a bit too absolute and narrow compared with common formulations.
Expert 3 — The Source Auditor
The highest-authority sources in this pool — multiple PubMed Central/peer-reviewed articles (Sources 1, 2, 3, 4), the American Psychological Association (Source 6), and Frontiers in Psychology (Source 5) — consistently define technostress as psychological stress arising from ICT use, with Source 2 explicitly stating it 'refers to psychological stress responses arising from interaction with information and communication technologies.' The opponent's objections are weak: the inclusion of physiological symptoms alongside psychological ones does not contradict the claim (psychological stress canonically produces somatic effects), and Source 8's dissenting expert view is a minority caveat within an article that still affirms ICT-related stress, while Source 16 is merely LLM background knowledge with no independent authority. The claim is well-supported by the most reliable, independent, peer-reviewed sources available.
Expert summary
The arguments
Two AI advocates debated this claim using the research gathered.
Argument for
Multiple highly authoritative sources consistently define technostress as psychological stress caused by the use of information and communication technologies: Source 2 explicitly states it 'refers to psychological stress responses arising from interaction with information and communication technologies,' Source 3 defines it as 'stress that individuals experience due to their use of ICTs' encompassing 'psychological strain reactions such as anxiety, fatigue, and feelings of overload,' and Source 5 from Frontiers in Psychology corroborates this with an identical framework. The convergence of peer-reviewed sources including PubMed Central (Sources 1, 2, 3, 4), the American Psychological Association (Source 6), and academic institutions (Source 13) across multiple years and disciplines constitutes overwhelming consensus that technostress is, by definition, psychological stress caused by ICT use, making the claim unambiguously true.
The Proponent's “overwhelming consensus” claim is overstated because the brief contains explicit definitional counterexamples: BMC Psychology defines technostress as both psychological and physiological reactions to perceived inability to handle ICT demands (Source 4, BMC Psychology/PMC), and EBSCO likewise frames it as stress-related physical, mental, or emotional symptoms rather than purely psychological stress (Source 10, EBSCO). More importantly, the Proponent equivocates on causality—while several papers describe stress “due to” ICT use, APA reporting notes expert disagreement that what is labeled technostress is often broader occupational stressors merely mediated through digital tools rather than caused by ICTs per se, directly undermining the motion's causal wording (Source 8, American Psychological Association).
Argument against
The motion is false because the brief itself shows “technostress” is not consistently defined as psychological stress caused by ICT use: BMC Psychology explicitly frames it as both psychological and physiological reactions to perceived inability to handle ICT demands (Source 4, BMC Psychology/PMC), and EBSCO likewise describes physical, mental, or emotional symptoms rather than a purely psychological phenomenon (Source 10, EBSCO). Moreover, APA reporting notes experts who argue what people label technostress is often broader occupational stressors merely mediated through digital tools—not stress caused by ICTs per se—undercutting the claim's causal wording (Source 8, American Psychological Association).
The Opponent commits a false dichotomy by treating the inclusion of physiological symptoms alongside psychological ones as a contradiction of the claim, when in fact psychological stress canonically produces somatic manifestations — a point Source 9 explicitly acknowledges in describing technostress as encompassing 'cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and physiological responses,' all rooted in ICT use, which only reinforces rather than undermines the claim. Furthermore, the Opponent elevates the dissenting expert opinion cited in Source 8 — a minority view explicitly framed as a counter-position within a broader article that still affirms ICTs as the proximate stressor — above the overwhelming consensus of Sources 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 13, committing the fallacy of selective emphasis by treating a qualified caveat as a definitive refutation of the claim's causal framing.