406 Politics claim verifications avg. score 5.3/10 185 rated (mostly) true 200 rated (mostly) false
“United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 9 target 9.1 includes protecting digital and information and communications technology (ICT) networks from cyberattacks and disruptions.”
The claim is not supported by the official UN SDG framework. Target 9.1 is defined around physical and transport infrastructure, with indicators on road access and transport volumes. ICT appears under Target 9.c, focused on connectivity coverage, and none of the authoritative UN texts for 9.1 include protecting digital networks from cyberattacks or disruptions.
“The 2020 United States presidential election was stolen.”
The evidence does not support that the 2020 U.S. presidential election was stolen. Courts, election officials, and federal agencies repeatedly found no credible evidence of widespread fraud or manipulation that could have changed the outcome, and the results were lawfully certified. Isolated irregularities and investigations did not amount to a national scheme or an illegitimate result.
“Poland is a sovereign state with full legal authority over its domestic governance and foreign policy.”
Poland is a sovereign state that governs itself under its own constitution and conducts its own foreign relations. Constitutional texts, official state practice, and international recognition strongly support that core point. However, "full legal authority" overstates the position because Poland has accepted binding limits through EU membership and other international obligations.
“From January 20, 2025, through May 28, 2026, Donald Trump made more statements rated "False" by PolitiFact than any other person who was a current United States federal elected official during that period, according to PolitiFact's database.”
Available evidence strongly suggests Trump led current federal elected officials in PolitiFact statements rated “False” during the stated period, because his fact-check volume and false rulings were far above typical peers. However, the cited material does not directly publish the exact Jan. 20, 2025-May 28, 2026 cross-official count. The ranking is likely correct, but not directly demonstrated in the evidence provided.
“Before Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, the United States planned to establish a military school on the site of a former Soviet military base in Crimea.”
Available primary records do not support any U.S. plan to establish a military school in Crimea before the 2014 annexation. The key procurement document concerns repairs to a civilian school in Sevastopol, not conversion of a former Soviet base. Contemporaneous U.S. and NATO statements also explicitly denied reports of planned U.S. military facilities or training schools in Crimea.
“The United States Department of Defense, via the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), planned renovations to School No. 5 in Sevastopol, Crimea in 2013, before Russia annexed Crimea in 2014.”
U.S. government contracting records show NAVFAC sought bids in 2013 to renovate School No. 5 in Sevastopol, then canceled the project in 2014 after the Ukraine crisis. That means the renovation was planned before Russia’s March 2014 annexation of Crimea. The evidence does not support claims that the school project was really a U.S. naval base scheme.
“James Talarico follows a vegan diet.”
The evidence does not support the claim. Multiple recent, independent news reports document that Talarico has publicly denied being vegan, and coverage of his campaign trail meals describes him eating meat, eggs, and other non-vegan foods. The claim appears to stem from misreading a past campaign purchasing policy as a statement about his personal diet.
“Reporters Without Borders has documented restrictions on the press, limits on dissent, and increasing control of Russia's domestic information space.”
RSF has plainly and repeatedly reported restrictions on the press, limits on dissent, and expanding state control over Russia’s domestic information space. That documentation appears in RSF’s own country and thematic reports and is reinforced by multiple independent human-rights and press-freedom organizations. The claim accurately describes RSF’s published record.
“Russian state media outlets RT and Sputnik have shifted from acting primarily as linear broadcast propaganda outlets to acting as nodes within broader narrative-distribution networks.”
The evidence strongly supports the claim that RT and Sputnik now operate less as stand-alone broadcasters and more as hubs within wider narrative-distribution networks. Multiple official and academic sources describe their role in seeding, amplifying, and laundering narratives across proxies, social media, mirrors, and aligned communities. Traditional broadcasting still exists, but it no longer appears to be the outlets’ main strategic value.
“New York City's FY2027 budget was balanced without raising property taxes, slashing services, or drawing down the City's Rainy Day Fund or Retiree Health Benefit Trust reserves.”
The budget was balanced without tapping the City’s main reserves, and the evidence does not show broad service slashing as the way it was closed. But the claim overreaches on taxes: New York City did add a new pied-a-terre surcharge on certain high-value non-primary homes, generating about $500 million annually through property tax bills. That makes the blanket statement about “without raising property taxes” materially misleading.
“The administration of New York City Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani secured $7.6 billion in New York State aid for New York City through a partnership with New York Governor Kathy Hochul.”
The evidence supports the core point that New York City received a very large state aid package after coordinated action by Mayor Mamdani and Governor Hochul. Credible reporting puts that support at about $7.6 billion, while primary official statements usually describe it as nearly $8 billion. The main caveat is that state legislative leaders were also central to the package, so the claim slightly oversimplifies who secured it.
“Zohran Mamdani's administration eliminated New York City's budget deficit without laying off workers.”
The administration did close the immediate FY2027 budget gap without formal layoffs. Reporting and official budget materials indicate the balance was achieved through state aid, pension-payment restructuring, hiring restraint, and attrition rather than worker terminations. The caveat is that this was a one-year budget balance, not a permanent end to New York City's longer-term fiscal pressures.
“Zohran Mamdani, as Mayor of New York City, enacted a tax on wealthy individuals that raises $0.5 billion per year for New York City.”
The evidence indicates that a Mamdani-backed pied-à-terre tax was enacted and is officially projected to raise about $500 million a year for New York City. The main caveat is that this is not a general tax on wealthy people; it specifically targets luxury second homes. The revenue figure is also an estimate, not yet a confirmed annual amount collected.
“Zohran Mamdani's proposed mayoral budget plan includes hiring 1,000 additional teachers in New York City.”
The available evidence shows the executive budget proposal does include funding to hire 1,000 additional teachers. That figure appears in official budget presentations and is corroborated by several independent local outlets. The main caveat is that this is a proposed FY27 budget item, so final adoption and timing can still change.
“As a New York City mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani proposed allocating $122 million for New York City Public Schools in his campaign budget plan.”
The evidence does not support the claim as stated. Reliable reporting and official New York City budget documents tie the $122 million schools figure to Mamdani’s FY2027 executive budget as mayor, not to a campaign budget plan proposed while he was a candidate. That timing and context are the core of the claim, and they are wrong.
“U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi asked a federal judge in New York to deny the appointment of a special master to monitor the release of the "Epstein files."”
Reporting from Reuters and other outlets shows the Justice Department asked a New York federal judge to reject a request for a special master over the Epstein files, and Pam Bondi was a signatory to that filing. The key caveat is that the request was made jointly with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, not by Bondi alone. That does not alter the substance of the claim.
“On August 22, 2025, the United States Department of Justice produced approximately 33,000 pages to the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and those pages were already public.”
The date, sender, recipient, and approximate size of the production are well-supported by official records and contemporaneous reporting. The only meaningful caveat is that the tranche was not literally all already public: credible reports indicate a small portion, roughly 3%, included newly disclosed material. The overall takeaway remains that DOJ mostly turned over already public or previously shared records.
“A subpoena issued by the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on August 5, 2025 required U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce documents by August 19, 2025.”
Official House records directly support the claim. The August 5, 2025 subpoena required Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce documents by August 19, 2025, and later committee correspondence and news reports are consistent with that timeline. Confusion mainly arises because some later reports discuss a separate 2026 testimony subpoena.
“Rumen Radev is a pro-Russian political leader.”
Radev has repeatedly taken positions and used rhetoric that accommodated Russian interests, especially on sanctions, arms for Ukraine, and Crimea. But the broader label is too sweeping: official statements show he has condemned Russia’s invasion, backed Ukraine’s sovereignty, and kept Bulgaria anchored in the EU and NATO. The evidence supports a hedging, Russia-friendly posture more than a clear pro-Russian identity.
“Jeffrey Epstein worked for the Mossad.”
The available evidence does not show that Jeffrey Epstein worked for Mossad. The strongest official investigations found no evidence of foreign intelligence ties, while the case for the claim rests on speculation, circumstantial links, and an unverified informant allegation rather than documentary proof. Associations with Israeli figures are not, by themselves, evidence of Mossad employment.