Library.

“Donald Trump imposed new tariffs immediately after a Supreme Court ruling struck down his authority to do so.”

The claim is misleading. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court struck down Trump's tariffs imposed under IEEPA — but the new tariffs he announced shortly after were imposed under a completely different legal authority (Section 122 of the Trade Act), which the Court never invalidated. Saying the Court "struck down his authority to do so" falsely implies he acted in defiance of the ruling. Additionally, while Trump signed the new order the same day, the tariffs didn't take effect until days later, making "immediately imposed" an overstatement.

“A Supreme Court ruling on Trump's tariffs requires that consumers receive refunds for higher prices paid due to the tariffs.”

This claim is false. The Supreme Court ruled that IEEPA did not authorize Trump's tariffs, but it did not address refunds at all—it remanded those questions to the Court of International Trade. Any potential refund claims would be filed by importers through customs processes, not paid directly to consumers. There is no legal requirement that consumers receive refunds for higher prices. Some companies like FedEx have voluntarily pledged to pass refunds through, but that is a business decision, not a court mandate.

“The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a 15% global tariff program, ruling that the administration overstepped its authority.”

The Supreme Court did strike down the administration's IEEPA-based tariffs on February 20, 2026, ruling the president lacked statutory authority. However, the claim's reference to a "15% global tariff program" is inaccurate. The 15% figure refers to a separate tariff the administration announced after the ruling under different legal authority (Section 122 of the Trade Act), which was not struck down. The claim conflates two distinct tariff actions, creating a misleading picture of what the Court actually invalidated.

“The US Supreme Court blocked major parts of Donald Trump's global tariff program.”

The claim is largely accurate. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that IEEPA does not authorize tariffs, striking down the sweeping "reciprocal" and "fentanyl" tariffs covering imports from nearly every country — the centerpiece of Trump's global tariff agenda. However, the ruling was limited to IEEPA-based tariffs; other trade authorities (Section 232, 301, etc.) were unaffected, and Trump quickly reimposed a 15% global tariff under alternative statutes, substantially limiting the practical impact of the block.