Library

8 published verifications about West Bengal West Bengal ×

“After the results of the 2026 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election were announced, thousands of people left border districts of West Bengal, India, in a mass exodus toward Bangladesh.”

False

The evidence does not show that thousands left West Bengal for Bangladesh after the 2026 election results. The viral video used to support the claim was identified as old, unrelated footage from Bangladesh, and border authorities said checks found no sign of any mass movement. Reporting about border tensions and migration politics does not substantiate this specific event.

“Indian Police Service officer Ajay Pal Sharma was transferred from the Uttar Pradesh cadre to the West Bengal cadre for a five-year tenure on May 6, 2026.”

False

The claim is not supported by the evidence. Multiple independent fact-checks reported that no official Ministry of Home Affairs order transferred Ajay Pal Sharma from the Uttar Pradesh cadre to the West Bengal cadre for five years on May 6, 2026. The viral story appears to stem from unverified social-media posts and confusion with a temporary election-related assignment, not a formal cadre transfer or deputation order.

“As of May 6, 2026, a senior West Bengal government official (including the Chief Minister of West Bengal) publicly advocated statewide alcohol prohibition in West Bengal, but the Government of West Bengal had not announced any official plan to implement statewide alcohol prohibition.”

Mostly False

The evidence does not show that any senior West Bengal government official, including the Chief Minister, publicly called for statewide alcohol prohibition by May 6, 2026. What is supported is narrower: viral claims about Bengal becoming a dry state were debunked, and the government had discussed only localized liquor-sale restrictions and election-related dry days, not a statewide prohibition plan.

“As of May 6, 2026, illegal immigrants were leaving West Bengal, India, for other Indian states in significant numbers.”

False

The evidence does not support this claim. Credible reports from early May 2026 describe alleged illegal Bangladeshi migrants being deported, pushed back, or trying to return from West Bengal to Bangladesh, not relocating in significant numbers to other Indian states. The internal-migration version rests on unverified social-media commentary and misreading of sources.

“On May 6, 2026, Muslims from multiple countries gathered in Hooghly district, West Bengal, India.”

False

The evidence does not support a multi-country Muslim gathering in Hooghly district on May 6, 2026. Credible fact-checks show the widely shared footage was from the Biswa Ijtema in Puinan, Hooghly, held on January 2-5, 2026. The core event was real, but the date in the claim is wrong, which materially changes what happened.

“After the Bharatiya Janata Party won the 2024 Indian general election, a video showed a dense crowd carrying bundles leaving West Bengal, India.”

False

The available evidence does not support that a real post–2024 election video showed a dense crowd “carrying bundles” leaving West Bengal after the BJP’s win. Multiple independent fact-checks instead trace the viral crowd footage used with this narrative to older, unrelated events—often from the 2021 West Bengal election period—or even to footage from outside India (e.g., Bangladesh). The claim relies on miscaptioned/recycled video rather than a verified post-election scene.

“Firhad Hakim, a minister in the West Bengal government and Mayor of Kolkata, arranged for a 9-year-old child (his daughter or granddaughter) to cast a vote in an election.”

False

Available reporting supports only that Firhad Hakim brought family members to the polling booth and a 9-year-old granddaughter was photographed with an ink mark. Credible accounts describe this as ink applied “for fun,” and none of the cited sources provides official confirmation, booth testimony, or records showing the child was issued a ballot or voted. The allegation that Hakim arranged for a minor to cast a vote is not substantiated.

“Mahatma Gandhi renounced a Knighthood in response to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre of 1919.”

False

This claim confuses two historical figures and two distinct British honors. It was Rabindranath Tagore — not Mahatma Gandhi — who renounced a knighthood in protest of the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre. Gandhi held the Kaiser-i-Hind medal, an entirely different civilian honor, which he returned in 1920 as part of the broader Non-Cooperation Movement. The claim is wrong on both the person and the nature of the honor.