Library

985 published verifications avg. score 4.7/10 329 rated true or mostly true 629 rated false or misleading

“China has successfully landed a spacecraft on the far side of the Moon.”

True

China's far-side lunar landings are among the most well-documented space achievements of the past decade. Chang'e-4 soft-landed in the Von Kármán crater on January 3, 2019 — a world first — and Chang'e-6 followed with a second far-side landing in June 2024, also returning samples to Earth. These events are confirmed by Chinese state sources, major international wire services, and Western science media, with no credible dispute from any space agency or scientific body.

“As of April 3, 2026, H5N1 avian influenza has achieved sustained human-to-human transmission.”

False

Every major public health authority contradicts this claim. The CDC (March 2026), WHO (through March 27, 2026), and ECDC (February 2026) all explicitly state that no sustained human-to-human transmission of H5N1 has been detected. The only counterarguments rest on a single unresolved case and general surveillance uncertainty — neither of which constitutes evidence that sustained transmission chains exist. The claim asserts as fact something the best available evidence directly refutes.

“Vitamin D deficiency is widely overdiagnosed in clinical practice.”

Misleading

Strong evidence shows vitamin D testing is widely overused — with studies finding 57–77% of tests lack clinical justification — but the claim conflates overtesting with overdiagnosis. Overtesting means ordering tests without guideline indications; overdiagnosis means incorrectly labeling healthy people as deficient. While contested diagnostic thresholds may inflate deficiency labels in some populations, global data also show substantial true deficiency prevalence with meaningful health associations. The unqualified assertion that deficiency is "widely overdiagnosed" overstates what the clinical literature supports.

“Taurine supplementation supports mood and emotional health in humans.”

Misleading

The evidence does not yet support this broad claim. While taurine has a plausible biological mechanism (acting on GABA and glycine receptors) and consistent animal-model results, the only notable human clinical evidence comes from a single small trial in first-episode psychosis patients using taurine as an add-on to standard treatment — not as a standalone supplement for general mood support. Authoritative sources, including ColumbiaDoctors, explicitly state that randomized clinical trials are still needed to determine whether taurine supplements improve health in humans.

“Startups with two-syllable names have a statistically higher probability of reaching a unicorn valuation (≥$1 billion) compared to startups with names of other syllable counts.”

False

No credible evidence supports the specific assertion that two-syllable startup names carry a statistically higher probability of reaching unicorn valuation. The available research addresses broader "short name" advantages (typically grouping one-to-two syllables together) without isolating a two-syllable effect, and the only syllable-specific quantitative data actually points to monosyllabic names as most correlated with top-tier VC funding. No peer-reviewed study tests this precise hypothesis, and the supporting sources are branding blogs with commercial interests and no statistical methodology.

“Approximately 75% of job applications are automatically rejected by applicant tracking systems before being reviewed by a human recruiter.”

False

This widely repeated statistic has no credible empirical foundation. The 75% figure traces back to a 2012 press release from Preptel, a now-defunct company that never published its methodology. The most rigorous available evidence directly contradicts the claim: a 2026 survey of 1,000 U.S. hiring managers found only 19% use AI to screen out applications before human review, and a separate recruiter survey found 92% confirmed their ATS does not auto-reject based on resume content. The apparent consensus among career blogs repeating this figure reflects circular sourcing, not independent verification.

“The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park triggered a trophic cascade that fundamentally transformed the park's ecosystem.”

Misleading

Wolf reintroduction did produce some trophic-cascade effects in parts of Yellowstone, but describing it as a force that "fundamentally transformed" the park's ecosystem overstates the scientific evidence. Peer-reviewed research and the National Park Service itself acknowledge that the cascade is weaker, more spatially variable, and more confounded by other factors — including hydrology, climate, and human elk harvest — than popular accounts suggest. Key quantitative claims underpinning the "transformation" narrative have been challenged as methodologically flawed in recent studies.

“AI-generated deepfake X-ray images are sufficiently realistic to cause radiologists to make incorrect diagnoses.”

Misleading

The evidence confirms that AI-generated deepfake X-rays can deceive radiologists — with only 41% spontaneously detecting fakes in a major 2026 study — but it does not demonstrate that this deception causes incorrect diagnoses. The same study found comparable diagnostic accuracy on real versus synthetic images (91.3% vs. 92.4%), undermining the claim's causal assertion. The claim conflates "hard to detect" with "causes misdiagnosis," an inferential leap the available research does not support.

“Using artificial intelligence tools causes a decline in human intelligence over time.”

Misleading

Research links cognitive risks to excessive or exclusive AI reliance, not to AI tool use in general — making this claim a significant overstatement. Multiple peer-reviewed studies find that heavy, passive dependence on AI can reduce cognitive engagement and retention, but the same literature emphasizes that moderate use shows minimal impact and that outcomes depend on how tools are used. The blanket causal framing strips away these critical conditions and ignores evidence that AI can also augment cognition.

“The Great Wall of China is visible from space with the naked eye.”

False

This widely repeated claim is a persistent myth debunked by NASA, peer-reviewed optical studies, and multiple astronauts. The Great Wall's width—only a few meters—falls far below the threshold of human visual acuity at orbital distances, regardless of its impressive length. NASA states the Wall is "difficult or impossible to see from Earth orbit" without high-powered lenses, and China's own astronaut Yang Liwei confirmed he could not see it. A handful of contested anecdotal quotes do not overturn the scientific and observational consensus.

“As of 2026, AI-generated videos are realistic enough to fool the majority of viewers without the use of technical detection tools.”

False

The strongest peer-reviewed evidence directly contradicts this claim. A large 2026 University of Florida controlled study published in PubMed found that humans correctly identified deepfake videos approximately two-thirds of the time — meaning most viewers are not fooled. Sources supporting the claim rely on qualitative assertions about realism or low-authority industry statistics with unclear provenance that contradict the gold-standard empirical findings. The claim overgeneralizes from specific high-quality deepfake scenarios to all AI-generated video.

“The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) lacks scientific validity as a personality assessment tool.”

Mostly True

Mainstream research psychology broadly regards the MBTI as lacking strong scientific validity, a position anchored by the APA's own assessment that it has "little credibility among research psychologists" and a 2025 systematic review finding 50% of participants receive different type results on retesting. The claim's absolute framing slightly overstates the case: some MBTI subscales show acceptable reliability in certain studies, and the sharpest criticisms target the forced binary "type" categorization rather than every psychometric property of the instrument.

“Having at least one person with different political or religious views in an individual's close personal network is associated with significantly less extreme beliefs in that individual.”

Misleading

The underlying research supports a general link between cross-cutting social contact and reduced prejudice or affective polarization, but the claim overstates this by asserting that merely one differing-view close tie produces "significantly less extreme beliefs." Key studies actually measure prejudice or warmth toward out-groups—not belief extremity—and some research finds null or backfire effects depending on context and contact quality. The specific threshold framing and the word "significantly" go beyond what the evidence reliably demonstrates.

“Sicily is the largest island located entirely within the European Union.”

True

Sicily's status as the largest island entirely within the EU is well-supported by geographic and political evidence. Every European island larger than Sicily (~25,700 km²)—Great Britain, Iceland, and the island of Ireland—falls outside the EU or is split between EU and non-EU jurisdictions. The counterargument that the Republic of Ireland should count conflates a political entity with a geographic island; the island of Ireland as a whole is not entirely EU territory due to Northern Ireland's UK status.

“Variants in the MTHFR gene are associated with increased inflammation in humans.”

Misleading

The relationship between MTHFR variants and inflammation is real but far more nuanced than the claim suggests. Peer-reviewed evidence confirms that the C677T variant can associate with higher inflammatory markers (e.g., elevated NLR, CRP), but the other common variant—A1298C—trends in the opposite direction in the same study design. Treating "MTHFR variants" as a uniform class linked to increased inflammation overgeneralizes the evidence and omits variant-specific and population-specific differences that materially change the picture.

“The average human attention span is shorter than that of a goldfish.”

False

The "goldfish attention span" comparison is built on fabricated, untraceable data. The widely cited figures — 8 seconds for humans, 9 seconds for goldfish — originate from a Microsoft Canada marketing report that sourced them from "Statistic Brain," a reference that could not be verified by the National Library of Medicine. No peer-reviewed study supports either figure, and no validated method exists for measuring a goldfish's attention span. Multiple academic and expert sources identify this as a debunked myth.

“Moore's Law, which predicts the doubling of transistors on integrated circuits approximately every two years, has effectively ended as of March 2026.”

Misleading

The evidence supports that classical transistor-density doubling has slowed significantly and become less predictable, but it does not support the claim that Moore's Law has "effectively ended" as of March 2026. Multiple authoritative 2026 sources — including imec, TechInsights, and industry roadmaps — describe ongoing 2nm-era scaling and characterize the trend as evolving or transforming rather than terminated. The claim overstates a real slowdown into a definitive, time-stamped conclusion that the available evidence does not warrant.

“AI-generated code contains fewer bugs than human-written code as of March 31, 2026.”

False
· 50+ views

Available evidence as of March 2026 consistently shows the opposite: AI-generated code produces roughly 1.7× more issues per pull request than human-written code, including higher rates of logic errors, security vulnerabilities, and correctness defects. Multiple independent analyses — from CodeRabbit, TechRadar, and Stack Overflow — confirm this pattern. Arguments citing narrow subcategory wins (e.g., fewer spelling errors) or AI-powered testing tools do not support the broader claim about AI-generated code quality.

“The carnivore diet (an all-animal-product diet excluding plant foods) is beneficial to human health.”

False

The weight of credible scientific and medical evidence does not support the claim that an all-meat carnivore diet is beneficial to human health. While some short-term improvements in select biomarkers (weight loss, HbA1c) have been observed in self-reported surveys, the most authoritative sources—including a 2026 scoping review, Harvard, the British Heart Foundation, and Cleveland Clinic—consistently flag substantial risks: nutrient deficiencies, elevated LDL cholesterol, loss of protective fiber and phytochemicals, and plausible cardiovascular harm. No major medical body recommends this diet.

“Subtle cues can influence people's decisions without their conscious awareness.”

Mostly True

Controlled experiments do show that information presented outside conscious awareness can measurably shift decision outcomes, supporting the core claim. However, the evidence is strongest for low-level perceptual and implicit memory effects, not for robust influence on complex real-world decisions. Critical reviews and a major meta-analysis reveal that many higher-order priming and nudge effects shrink dramatically or vanish after correcting for publication bias and methodological weaknesses. The claim is directionally correct but overstates the breadth and reliability of the phenomenon.