Library

2,554 published verifications avg. score 5.6/10 1,246 rated true or mostly true 1,065 rated false or mostly false

“After an initial course of acupuncture for migraine management, maintenance acupuncture sessions are typically done monthly or as needed.”

Mostly False

The evidence does not support monthly or as-needed maintenance acupuncture as a typical post-course schedule for migraine. Stronger sources describe the initial treatment course and possible durable benefit, but do not identify a standard maintenance frequency. Some clinics recommend monthly or flexible booster visits, yet those suggestions are individualized practice advice rather than an established norm in the medical literature.

“Acupuncture sessions for migraine treatment typically last 45–60 minutes, including consultation time.”

Mostly True

The core claim is supported: reputable migraine guidance says acupuncture visits commonly run about an hour and include consultation or assessment time. Shorter durations in many studies usually refer only to needle-retention time, not the full appointment. The main caveat is that “45–60 minutes” is a narrower range than the best sources directly establish, and real-world visit length varies by clinic and visit type.

“Acupuncture is used both for migraine prevention (reducing future migraine attack frequency) and for relief during an active migraine attack.”

True

Available evidence supports both parts of the claim. Acupuncture is well studied as a preventive option for migraine, with multiple systematic reviews showing reduced attack frequency. It has also been used during active migraine attacks in trials and some clinical settings, although the acute-use evidence is much smaller and it is not a standard first-line abortive treatment.

“Only two of seven triptan medicines available globally are publicly funded in New Zealand: sumatriptan and rizatriptan.”

True

Current New Zealand evidence supports the claim. PHARMAC’s schedule and decision records show that only sumatriptan and rizatriptan are publicly funded, while the other five triptan medicines used globally are not subsidised in New Zealand. Older sources about availability or approval do not rebut this, because they address access rather than public funding.

“In New Zealand, funded sumatriptan and funded rizatriptan are available at the standard prescription co-payment of about NZ$5 for people with a Community Services Card.”

False

The evidence does not support this statement. Official New Zealand sources indicate Community Services Card holders generally pay no co-payment for fully subsidised prescriptions from publicly funded or approved providers, not “about NZ$5.” In addition, the materials provided directly support funded sumatriptan but do not directly verify funded rizatriptan.

“The British royal family owns one-third of all countries in the world.”

False

The claim is not supported by the evidence. The British royal family does not own countries; in Commonwealth realms, the monarch serves as a constitutional head of state in independent sovereign nations. The number is also wildly wrong: even the broadest relevant count is about 15 countries, not one-third of the world.

“Consuming caffeine via energy drinks is worse for health than consuming an equivalent amount of caffeine via coffee.”

Mostly True

The evidence indicates that energy drinks generally cause more adverse acute cardiovascular effects than the same amount of caffeine from coffee. Randomized trials show larger changes in blood pressure and electrical heart measures after energy drinks, including one direct caffeine-matched coffee comparison. But the claim is broader than the evidence: most studies are short-term, use surrogate markers, and do not prove worse overall or long-term health outcomes in every circumstance.

“A recommended initial course of 6–10 sessions at clinics in Auckland, New Zealand, typically totals NZ$480–NZ$1,400 before any maintenance sessions.”

Mostly False

The stated total is not a reliable typical range for Auckland clinics as a whole. Better-sourced Auckland therapy pricing shows many mainstream professional services already cost about NZ$1,350–NZ$1,680 for 6 sessions, exceeding the claim's upper limit. The range can fit some lower-cost wellness, counselling, or cosmetic packages, but the claim omits that crucial distinction and overstates how typical those prices are.

“Sessions at clinics in Auckland, New Zealand, typically cost NZ$80–NZ$140 each.”

Mostly False

The claim overstates what a typical Auckland clinic visit costs. Many routine GP and general clinic appointments, especially for enrolled patients, are commonly below NZ$80, often in roughly the NZ$26–NZ$65 range. NZ$80–NZ$140 is more characteristic of higher-priced subsets such as urgent care, non-enrolled or visitor consults, and some private or specialized services, not clinic sessions overall.

“The character designs of the anime series "Serial Experiments Lain" were inspired by the anime series "Neon Genesis Evangelion".”

False

Available evidence does not support any direct Evangelion-to-Lain character-design link. Creator statements instead point to other named illustrators and artistic influences, and production commentary rejects Evangelion as a source of inspiration. Comparisons between the two series are largely thematic or retrospective, not evidence that Lain’s character designs were based on Evangelion.

“Digital piracy reduces companies' revenue in the long run.”

Mixed

Some studies show that digital piracy displaces paid consumption and can reduce revenue, especially in particular products or markets. But the broader claim goes too far: long-run effects vary by industry, product, and business model, and meta-analytic evidence does not show a consistent across-the-board revenue decline. A narrower claim that piracy can reduce revenue in some contexts would be better supported.

“The anime series "Serial Experiments Lain" includes credits in its opening (intro) and ending (outro) sequences.”

True

The available evidence shows that Serial Experiments Lain normally presents on-screen credits in both its opening and ending sequences. Multiple direct video examples show credited OP/ED versions, and the existence of separate “creditless” uploads supports that those are alternate textless variants rather than the default presentation. Some releases may differ, but the core claim is accurate.

“Soundtrack releases credited to The Seatbelts for the anime "Cowboy Bebop" include at least 4 to 6 Japanese hip-hop tracks in total.”

False

The evidence does not support this count. Authoritative soundtrack listings and discography databases describe Cowboy Bebop’s Seatbelts releases as genre-mixing but predominantly jazz, blues, and rock, and none identifies 4 to 6 tracks as Japanese hip-hop. Mentions of hip-hop as an influence are too general to prove a specific number of Japanese hip-hop songs.

“No lossless (FLAC) archive of the album "malii" by Draft.__ exists, and the album is available only in MP3 quality.”

Mostly False

Available evidence suggests no widely indexed FLAC release of "malii" was found on major music platforms or common archives. But that does not prove no lossless archive exists anywhere, and it does not firmly establish that the album is available only as MP3. The claim overstates what negative search results can show.

“The animated television series "The Boondocks" was produced with PAL video standards in mind for Season 1, and with NTSC video standards in mind for later seasons.”

False

The claim is not supported by reliable evidence. Authoritative sources identify The Boondocks as a U.S. Adult Swim series, and none document that Season 1 was produced for PAL while later seasons were produced for NTSC. The only direct support appears to be an unverified forum post, which is not enough to establish a specific production workflow or season-by-season standards shift.

“Publishing a research paper about factual disagreement in frontier AI models can be considered a conflict of interest for an AI fact-checking company.”

True

The claim is well supported because conflict-of-interest standards commonly include organizational and professional interests that may affect, or appear to affect, objectivity. An AI fact-checking company has an evident stake in research about factual disagreement in frontier models, so such publishing can reasonably be treated as a potential competing interest. That does not mean the paper is improper; it usually means disclosure and management may be warranted.

“A scheme is equivalent to a Zariski sheaf on the category of affine schemes that is locally representable by affine schemes.”

Mostly True

The claim states a standard characterization of schemes in functorial language. Authoritative sources confirm that schemes are exactly Zariski sheaves on affine schemes that admit a local affine presentation. The main caveat is precision: the local affine pieces must glue as open subfunctors or open immersions on the big affine Zariski site, not via arbitrary maps.

“Trumpism is a neo-fascist political ideology or movement.”

Mixed

The evidence does not support treating this label as a settled fact. Some scholars and commentators do classify Trumpism as neo-fascist or fascistic, but a substantial body of equally credible scholarship rejects that classification and instead describes it as authoritarian populism or a related form of democratic backsliding. Because the conclusion depends heavily on which definition of fascism is used, the categorical wording overstates what the evidence proves.

“In association football, a match decided by a penalty shoot-out after being level at the end of extra time is officially recorded as a draw, with the shoot-out used only to determine which team advances or wins the title.”

True

The evidence supports the core point. Under IFAB rules, kicks from the penalty mark happen after the match has ended and do not change the scoreline, so the match remains a draw after extra time. FIFA reporting reflects this by listing the draw and the shoot-out separately to identify who advances or becomes champion.

“Brazilian citizens can obtain Italian citizenship by descent (jure sanguinis) under current Italian law.”

Mostly True

Italian law still permits some Brazilian citizens to obtain citizenship by descent, so the statement is not unsupported. However, the 2025 reform drastically narrowed eligibility: most Brazilian descendants who already hold Brazilian citizenship no longer qualify unless they fit narrow exceptions, typically tied to an Italian-only parent or grandparent, transitional status, or a parent’s qualifying residence in Italy.