Library

495 claim verifications avg. score 4.3/10 139 rated true or mostly true 355 rated false or misleading

“Shaving hair causes it to grow back thicker and darker than before.”

False
· 250+ views

This is a longstanding myth with no scientific support. Shaving does not cause hair to grow back thicker or darker. Major medical authorities (Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic) and controlled human studies dating back to 1928 confirm that shaving has no effect on hair thickness, color, or growth rate. The "thicker and darker" appearance people notice is an optical illusion: shaving creates blunt-cut tips that feel coarser and look darker compared to naturally tapered, sun-lightened hair ends.

“SPF 50 sunscreen is stronger than necessary for most people.”

Misleading
· 100+ views

This claim is misleading. While it's technically true that SPF 30 blocks ~97% of UVB rays versus ~98% for SPF 50 under ideal lab conditions, most people apply only 20–50% of the recommended amount. That means an SPF 50 sunscreen may deliver only ~SPF 25 in real-world use, making it a practical necessity rather than overkill. Major dermatology organizations recommend SPF 30 as a minimum, not a ceiling, and the Skin Cancer Foundation recommends SPF 50+ for extended outdoor exposure.

“Short distance driving without allowing the engine to warm up increases engine wear.”

Mostly True
· 100+ views

The claim is largely accurate. It is well-established in automotive engineering that cold starts cause elevated engine wear due to insufficient oil circulation, loose metal tolerances, and fuel dilution — and short trips multiply cold-start frequency per mile driven. However, the claim oversimplifies: the severity varies significantly by oil type, ambient temperature, engine age, and vehicle design. Modern synthetic oils and engine management systems have substantially reduced (though not eliminated) this effect. Idling to "warm up" is itself counterproductive; gentle driving is the recommended approach.

“The mathematical equation 1+1 equals 2.”

True
· 250+ views

The claim is mathematically true. Multiple credible sources confirm that 1+1=2 within standard mathematical systems (Peano arithmetic, set theory), including rigorous proofs from Russell and Whitehead's foundational work. The equation holds in ordinary mathematics as universally understood.

“Environmental factors have a greater influence on human development than genetic factors.”

Misleading
· 100+ views

This claim significantly oversimplifies the science. While environmental factors are important, peer-reviewed research shows the balance between genes and environment is highly trait-specific: genetics accounts for 50–80% of variance in cognition/intelligence, and the broadest meta-analysis (14.5 million twin pairs) found only a roughly 51/49 split that includes measurement error. Modern behavioral genetics emphasizes gene-environment interplay, not the dominance of either factor. The blanket claim of environmental superiority is not supported by the weight of evidence.

“The Earth has a flat shape rather than a spherical shape.”

False
· 100+ views

The claim is false. Multiple independent, repeatable observations (satellite/space imagery, Earth’s consistently round shadow during lunar eclipses, horizon and latitude/star-visibility effects, and circumnavigation) confirm Earth is an oblate spheroid. The cited sources unanimously refute flat-Earth arguments; no credible evidence in the record supports a flat Earth.

“The ABC conjecture has been proven as of March 18, 2026.”

False
· Trending · 4K+ views

The ABC conjecture has not been proven in any broadly accepted sense as of March 18, 2026. While Mochizuki's proof was published by RIMS in Kyoto, leading mathematicians including Peter Scholze and Jakob Stix identified a serious, unfixable gap that remains unresolved. The RIMS publication carries a conflict of interest, and Joshi's subsequent defense is explicitly conditional on acceptance of enhancements the community has not endorsed. As of early 2026, the conjecture remains "a theorem in Kyoto, a conjecture everywhere else."

“Electric vehicles have a higher total carbon footprint than gasoline-powered cars.”

False
· 250+ views

This claim is false. While electric vehicles do have higher manufacturing emissions — particularly from battery production — every major lifecycle assessment from authoritative sources (US EPA, EU Climate Action, peer-reviewed studies) finds that these are typically offset by lower emissions during the vehicle's use phase. Over a full cradle-to-grave lifecycle, EVs produce significantly less CO₂ than comparable gasoline cars on most electricity grids. The claim cherry-picks production-phase data and misapplies unrelated macro-level studies to reach an unsupported conclusion.

“Some species of baleen whales, including the blue whale, are the largest known animals in the world.”

True
· 250+ views

This claim is true. The blue whale, a baleen whale, is widely recognized by authoritative sources—including Britannica, NOAA Fisheries, and Guinness World Records—as the largest animal ever to have lived on Earth, measured by mass and overall body size. The phrasing "some species of baleen whales, including the blue whale" is logically satisfied by the blue whale alone. The only minor caveat is that by linear length, the bootlace worm exceeds the blue whale, but "largest" conventionally refers to overall size, not length.

“Jim Simons kept his trading practices secret because he did not understand how he achieved his investment returns.”

False
· 100+ views

The claim is false. The only supporting evidence refers to Simons' early 1980s period when he traded on intuition and lost money, not his later systematic approach that generated massive returns. Multiple sources show he clearly understood his data-driven methodology.

“The peregrine falcon is the fastest animal in the world.”

Mostly True
· 100+ views

The peregrine falcon is widely recognized as the fastest animal on Earth, with Guinness World Records certifying diving speeds up to 389 km/h (242 mph). This is confirmed by Britannica, Audubon, and other authoritative sources, and no other animal has been documented moving faster in any mode of locomotion. The one caveat: this record speed occurs only during a specialized hunting dive (stoop), not in level flight, where the peregrine is far slower. The claim reflects established consensus but omits this important context.

“The cheetah is the fastest land animal on Earth.”

True
· 250+ views

The cheetah is universally recognized as the fastest land animal by maximum sprint speed, with documented top speeds of 103–114 km/h. This is confirmed by Britannica, Guinness World Records, Imperial College London research, and peer-reviewed studies. The pronghorn excels at sustained endurance speed over longer distances, but "fastest land animal" conventionally refers to top sprint speed — and on that metric, the cheetah's title is uncontested.

“Most adults of Western descent are unable to digest milk due to lactose intolerance.”

False
· 250+ views

This claim is false. In medical and genetic contexts, "Western descent" refers to European ancestry — the population with the highest rates of lactase persistence worldwide. Studies consistently show only 5–28% of Europeans are lactose intolerant, meaning the vast majority can digest milk. The claim appears to confuse global lactose intolerance rates (68%) with rates specific to European-descended populations. Lactase persistence evolved in European populations over millennia of dairy farming, making lactose tolerance — not intolerance — the norm.

“Making abortion free of charge results in an increased rate of abortions being used as a method of contraception.”

Misleading
· 100+ views

This claim is misleading. While research shows that reducing the cost of abortion increases the number of abortions among women already facing unintended pregnancies, the specific assertion that free abortion leads women to use it as a method of contraception is not supported by the evidence. The most-cited historical example (Soviet era) is confounded by simultaneous contraceptive scarcity. Studies on repeat abortion find these patients were often already using contraception, not forgoing it. The claim conflates price sensitivity with intentional contraceptive substitution—a leap the research does not support.

“Exposure to urban air pollution is a direct cause of dementia.”

Misleading
· 50+ views

The claim that urban air pollution is a "direct cause" of dementia overstates the scientific evidence. Multiple high-quality reviews and meta-analyses consistently show a strong association between long-term air pollution exposure (especially PM2.5) and increased dementia risk, with plausible biological mechanisms identified. However, authoritative sources — including the Alzheimer's Society and recent systematic reviews — explicitly state that a direct causal link has not been proven. The accurate framing is that air pollution is a significant modifiable risk factor for dementia, not a confirmed direct cause.

“Current atmospheric CO2 levels are not unprecedented when compared to levels found throughout Earth's full geological record.”

Mostly True
· 100+ views

The claim is technically accurate: multiple peer-reviewed studies confirm CO2 exceeded 1,000–2,000 ppm during earlier geological periods (e.g., Mesozoic, Eocene), well above today's ~422 ppm. However, the claim omits critical context. Current CO2 is the highest in at least 14 million years, the rate of increase is roughly 100 times faster than any known natural rise, and deep-time CO2 estimates carry large uncertainties (±500 ppm). The literal statement is defensible, but its framing can create a misleading impression that today's levels are unremarkable.

“Mandatory childhood vaccination schedules in Western countries cause a significant increase in autoimmune disorders.”

False
· 250+ views

This claim is not supported by the evidence. The most authoritative research — including a major meta-analysis of 144 studies spanning five decades — finds no significant increase in autoimmune disorders among vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations. While very rare, specific vaccine-autoimmune associations exist (e.g., GBS after influenza vaccination), these do not amount to a broad, schedule-driven rise. The claim's main supporting evidence comes from passive adverse-event reporting systems that cannot establish causation.

“Bulls are attracted to or agitated by the color red.”

False
· 100+ views

This is a well-known myth. Bulls have dichromatic vision and cannot perceive red the way humans do — it likely appears as a dull brownish or yellowish shade to them. Controlled experiments, including those by MythBusters, show bulls charge moving objects of any color equally and remain calm when objects are stationary. It is the movement of the matador's cape, not its color, that triggers aggression. The red cape is a tradition for human spectators, not a stimulus for the bull.

“Some major software companies currently report that the majority of their source code is written by artificial intelligence.”

Mostly True
· 500+ views

The claim is largely accurate. Google and Anthropic—both major software companies—have publicly stated that a majority of their new code is AI-generated (Google citing over 50% of weekly production check-ins, Anthropic citing 70-90% company-wide). However, these are self-reported figures from AI-focused firms, the metric typically refers to new code check-ins rather than entire codebases, and industry-wide averages remain well below 50%. The claim is true as stated but could easily be misread as an industry-wide trend.

“Frequent airplane travel increases cancer risk due to radiation exposure.”

Misleading
· 100+ views

This claim is misleading. While flying at altitude does increase exposure to cosmic ionizing radiation—a known carcinogen—the best available evidence from the CDC, peer-reviewed reviews, and military studies explicitly states that a causal link between in-flight radiation and cancer has not been established. Elevated cancer rates observed in aircrew are confounded by circadian disruption, UV exposure, and lifestyle factors. The claim also overgeneralizes from occupational aircrew data to all frequent flyers, and omits that any radiation-related risk increase is described as small.