298 Science claim verifications avg. score 5.4/10 128 rated true or mostly true 162 rated false or misleading
“Most human decisions are made unconsciously and are rationalized after the fact.”
Unconscious processes do influence many decisions, and post-hoc rationalization is a documented psychological phenomenon. However, the claim that "most" decisions are made unconsciously and rationalized afterward significantly overstates the evidence. Key neuroscience findings come from narrow lab tasks (e.g., simple button presses), not everyday decision-making. Critical peer-reviewed reviews warn that unconscious influence claims have been systematically inflated. The popular "95%" statistic lacks rigorous scientific backing. The claim contains a real kernel of truth but its sweeping framing is not supported.
“The 10,000-hour rule reliably predicts the attainment of expertise in a given field.”
The 10,000-hour rule does not reliably predict expertise. Meta-analyses show deliberate practice explains only 18–26% of skill variance across domains. Individual variation is enormous — chess masters have achieved mastery in as few as 3,016 hours while others never reached it after 25,000+. The "rule" is a popularized oversimplification of one violinist study's average, and its originator, K. Anders Ericsson, distanced himself from this framing. Genetics, instruction quality, and learning rates matter significantly.
“Power posing significantly increases confidence and success.”
The best available evidence — including large pre-registered studies and meta-analyses — shows power posing produces a real but small effect on subjective feelings of power. It does not reliably change hormones, and behavioral or cognitive outcomes that would constitute "success" are weak or absent. The claim's use of "significantly" overstates the effect size, and pairing "confidence" with "success" implies downstream real-world benefits that the evidence does not support. The original 2010 findings have been substantially undermined by replication failures.
“Walking barefoot on grass enables the human body to absorb electrons from the Earth's surface.”
The core claim is physically plausible: the Earth carries a negative surface charge, and conductive barefoot contact can equalize electrical potential, transferring electrons to the body. Multiple peer-reviewed papers report measurable changes in body voltage during grounding. However, the supporting research comes from a narrow group of authors, uses small samples, and frequently hedges with speculative language. The magnitude and physiological significance of this electron transfer remain scientifically contested, and no large-scale independent replication has confirmed the mechanism's health relevance.
“Airplanes are intentionally spraying chemicals into the atmosphere for the purpose of weather control or population manipulation.”
This claim is false. Every major scientific and governmental authority — including the US EPA, Met Office, WMO, and a survey of 76 out of 77 leading atmospheric scientists — has found no evidence of any secret aircraft spraying program for weather control or population manipulation. While legitimate, publicly disclosed geoengineering research (like cloud seeding and stratospheric aerosol injection studies) exists, these are transparent, small-scale activities — not covert operations via commercial aircraft. The "population manipulation" element has zero scientific basis.
“Satellite flares are a commonly cited explanation for UFO sightings.”
The claim is well-supported. Multiple credible sources—including Science News, Popular Mechanics, The Debrief, EarthSky, and BBC Sky at Night Magazine—consistently identify satellite flares (both classic Iridium flares and newer Starlink flaring) as a recognized, frequently cited explanation for UFO/UAP sightings. Counterarguments pointing to pre-satellite-era cases or other mundane explanations like drones don't negate the claim, which only asserts satellite flares are "commonly cited"—not that they explain all sightings.
“Alcohol completely evaporates from food when it is cooked.”
This is a widespread kitchen myth. USDA-funded research and peer-reviewed food science studies consistently show that alcohol never fully evaporates during cooking. Even after 2.5 hours of simmering or baking, approximately 5% of the original alcohol remains. Shorter methods retain far more — flambéing leaves 70–75% intact. Retention ranges from 4% to 95% depending on method, time, temperature, and other factors. The word "completely" makes this claim definitively false.
“Climate change increases the frequency of extreme weather events.”
The claim is largely accurate. The IPCC's AR6 assessment calls it an "established fact" that human-caused warming has increased the frequency and/or intensity of several major categories of extreme weather — particularly heat extremes, heavy precipitation, droughts, and compound events. However, the claim overgeneralizes: total hurricane counts are not clearly rising, and evidence for tornadoes and hail remains weak. The science supports "some extreme weather events are becoming more frequent," not a blanket increase across all types.
“Exposure to full moonlight overnight causes razor blades left outside to become dull.”
This is a folk myth with no scientific basis. Moonlight is reflected sunlight roughly 400,000 times weaker than direct sunlight — far too feeble to alter steel or drive meaningful oxidation overnight. Peer-reviewed MIT research shows razor blades dull through mechanical microchipping during use, not passive light exposure. No credible scientific study has ever demonstrated that moonlight dulls blades. The only "evidence" cited in support comes from anonymous forum posts proposing physically impossible mechanisms.
“Frequently charging a smartphone battery to 100% accelerates battery degradation compared to charging to lower levels.”
The claim is directionally accurate: peer-reviewed research confirms that higher state-of-charge accelerates lithium-ion battery degradation through well-understood mechanisms like SEI growth and lithium plating. Real-world smartphone tests also show measurably better capacity retention when charging is capped below 100%. However, the claim lacks important context: modern phones use battery management systems that reduce stress near full charge, and the practical effect over a typical phone's lifespan is often modest — not dramatic. The biggest factor is time spent at high charge levels, not simply reaching 100%.
“Lightning can strike the same location more than once.”
This claim is unambiguously true. NOAA, NASA, and multiple peer-reviewed studies confirm that lightning routinely strikes the same location more than once — across separate flashes and even separate storms. The Empire State Building is struck 20–25 times per year, and research has identified hundreds of "recurrent lightning spots" across natural terrain. The old saying "lightning never strikes twice" is a well-debunked myth.
“Water can simultaneously boil and freeze under specific pressure conditions.”
The claim is scientifically accurate. At water's triple point (~0.01°C and ~611 Pa), solid, liquid, and gas phases coexist in equilibrium, meaning the conditions for both boiling and freezing are simultaneously met. This is confirmed by NIST, peer-reviewed research, and multiple academic sources. The minor caveat: "simultaneously boil and freeze" slightly overstates the drama — it's thermodynamic equilibrium coexistence, not necessarily vigorous concurrent boiling and freezing — and the required pressure is just 0.6% of normal atmospheric pressure.
“Fogvid-24 is a secret chemical or biological experiment.”
"Fogvid-24" is a conspiracy theory with no credible evidence behind it. No atmospheric testing, chemical analysis, or government documentation supports the claim that recent fog events are secret experiments. Scientists and authoritative outlets explain the phenomena as ordinary winter fog trapping existing pollutants, coinciding with seasonal respiratory illness. Even sources sympathetic to the theory concede there is "no official evidence" linking the fog to any secret operation. The existence of past programs like Operation Sea Spray does not prove current fog is engineered.
“Norway generates more than 95% of its electricity from renewable sources as of March 4, 2026.”
Norway's electricity generation is well above 95% renewable. Statistics Norway (SSB) reports that hydro (87.8%) and wind (10.7%) together accounted for 98.5% of electricity generation in December 2025 — the most recent granular data available. This is corroborated by the European Environment Agency (~98%) and Enerdata (February 2026). Norway's renewable electricity share has been structurally above 95% for decades, and no evidence suggests any change by March 2026. The claim is accurate.
“China has developed a functional artificial womb capable of supporting human reproduction.”
This claim is false. The viral "pregnancy robot" story originated from Kaiwa Technology, whose founder later retracted the claims, clarifying the company only manufactured a humanoid shell — not an artificial womb. Fact-checkers and scientific experts confirm that full-term human ectogenesis remains far beyond current capabilities. No peer-reviewed evidence supports the existence of a functional artificial womb for human reproduction. Existing technologies like embryo-monitoring incubators and "mini-womb on a chip" platforms are categorically different from a system capable of gestating a human baby to term.
“The Earth will experience a loss of gravity for seven seconds during the solar eclipse in August 2026.”
This claim is false. NASA has explicitly stated that a solar eclipse has "no unusual impact on Earth's gravity" and that Earth cannot "lose gravity" without losing mass. The claim originated from a viral social media conspiracy post. While eclipses produce tiny, ordinary tidal variations in local gravity (on the order of 0.0000178%), this is not a "loss of gravity" — and certainly not a seven-second global shutdown. No credible scientific evidence supports this claim.
“The volume or mass of steel produced globally in one hour exceeds the total amount of gold mined throughout all of human history.”
The claim is misleading. Global steel production in 2025 averaged roughly 211,000 tonnes per hour, while estimates of all gold ever mined range from ~187,000 to ~220,000 tonnes depending on the source. The World Gold Council's directly applicable estimate (~219,890 tonnes mined throughout history) actually exceeds the hourly steel figure. The claim is only true if you cherry-pick the lowest gold estimate and the highest steel rate. The comparison is far closer than the claim implies, and the outcome reverses depending on which authoritative source is used.
“Creativity is an innate trait that individuals are born with or without.”
The claim that creativity is something people are simply "born with or without" is false. Peer-reviewed research consistently shows creativity is only partially heritable, polygenic (involving many genes with tiny effects), and significantly shaped by environmental factors. Multiple studies demonstrate creativity can be trained and developed. The scientific consensus treats creativity as a complex interplay of genetic predispositions and environmental influences — not a fixed, binary trait present or absent at birth.
“The COVID-19 virus was engineered in a laboratory.”
The claim that COVID-19 was "engineered" in a laboratory is not supported by the available evidence. While some U.S. intelligence agencies and political bodies have entertained a "lab leak" or "research-related incident" as plausible, this is a fundamentally different claim from deliberate genetic engineering. The WHO, peer-reviewed genomic analyses, and scientific meta-analyses consistently find no credible evidence of engineering, and most intelligence assessments explicitly state the virus was probably not genetically engineered.
“A single day on Venus is longer than a year on Venus.”
This claim is accurate under the standard definition used by NASA and other major space agencies: Venus's sidereal day (one full axial rotation) takes ~243 Earth days, while its orbital year takes only ~224.7 Earth days. However, the claim omits an important nuance: Venus's solar day (sunrise to sunrise) is only ~116.75 Earth days — shorter than its year — due to Venus's retrograde rotation. The unqualified word "day" creates ambiguity, but the dominant scientific framing supports the claim.